vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cintas (CTAS) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cintas is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.4B vs $5.9B, roughly 1.1× Cheniere Energy, Inc.). Cintas runs the higher net margin — 7.8% vs -58.1%, a 65.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, Cintas's revenue compounded faster (61.2% CAGR vs 36.6%).
Cintas Corporation is an American corporation headquartered in Mason, Ohio, which provides a range of products and services to businesses including uniforms, mats, mops, cleaning and restroom supplies, first aid and safety products, fire extinguishers and testing, and safety courses. Cintas is a publicly held company traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol CTAS and is a component of the S&P 500 Index.
Cheniere Energy, Inc. is an American liquefied natural gas (LNG) company headquartered in Houston, Texas.
CTAS vs LNG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.4B | $5.9B |
| Net Profit | $502.5M | $-3.4B |
| Gross Margin | 83.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 10.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 7.8% | -58.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.9% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 8.4% | -1092.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.24 | $-16.65 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $6.4B | $5.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $5.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $3.1B |
| Q1 26 | $502.5M | $-3.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $495.3M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $491.1M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $448.3M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $463.5M | $353.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $448.5M | $977.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $893.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $414.3M | $880.0M |
| Q1 26 | 83.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 50.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 10.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.4% | 70.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.7% | 42.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.4% | 56.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | 18.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.1% | 38.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 44.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.2% | 50.5% |
| Q1 26 | 7.8% | -58.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.7% | 42.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.1% | 24.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.8% | 36.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.8% | 6.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | 21.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.1% | 24.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.8% | 28.0% |
| Q1 26 | $1.24 | $-16.65 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.21 | $10.51 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.20 | $4.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.08 | $7.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.13 | $1.57 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.09 | $4.30 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.10 | $3.93 | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.00 | $3.84 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $183.2M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.8B | $8.7B |
| Total Assets | — | $46.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $183.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $200.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $138.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $264.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $243.4M | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $122.4M | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.4M | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $342.0M | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $22.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $22.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $22.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $22.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $22.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $22.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $22.6B |
| Q1 26 | $4.8B | $8.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $7.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $6.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $6.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6B | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $4.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $46.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.1B | $47.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $45.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.8B | $44.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6B | $43.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4B | $43.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1B | $43.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.2B | $42.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | 2.84× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.51× | 3.25× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.52× | 3.28× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.44× | 4.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.47× | 3.96× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.50× | 4.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.47× | 5.06× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.6B | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.3B | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.7% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.12× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.5B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $531.2M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $414.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $635.7M | $831.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $622.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $441.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $466.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $693.0M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $425.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $312.5M | $738.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $521.1M | $-193.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $522.1M | $605.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $340.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $373.8M | $875.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $591.1M | $613.0M |
| Q1 26 | 19.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.2% | 24.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | 17.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.5% | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | 11.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.3% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.9% | 23.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | 19.5% |
| Q1 26 | 4.7% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | 16.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 22.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 11.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | 16.0% |
| Q1 26 | 3.12× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.07× | 0.89× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.84× | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.42× | 0.51× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.34× | 3.48× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.98× | 1.68× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | 1.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.67× | 1.27× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTAS
Segment breakdown not available.
LNG
| LNG revenues | $5.7B | 97% |
| Other revenues | $112.0M | 2% |
| Regasification revenues | $34.0M | 1% |