vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Citi Trends Inc (CTRN) and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP (GLDD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($256.5M vs $197.1M, roughly 1.3× Citi Trends Inc). Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP runs the higher net margin — 4.9% vs -3.5%, a 8.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (26.5% vs 10.1%). Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($50.3M vs $767.0K). Over the past eight quarters, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP's revenue compounded faster (13.6% CAGR vs -4.3%).
Citi Trends, Inc. is an American retail clothing chain selling discounted products targeted primarily at African-American customers.
Great Lakes Dredge and Dock Company is an American company providing construction services in dredging and land reclamation, currently the largest such provider in the United States. GLD&D operates primarily in the United States but conducts one-quarter of its business overseas. The company was based in Oak Brook, Illinois, but in October 2020 relocated its corporate headquarters to Houston, Texas.
CTRN vs GLDD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $197.1M | $256.5M |
| Net Profit | $-6.9M | $12.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 20.9% |
| Operating Margin | -3.7% | 12.7% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | 4.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.1% | 26.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.6% | -35.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.86 | $0.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $197.1M | $256.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.8M | $195.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $201.7M | $193.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $211.2M | $242.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $179.1M | $202.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $176.6M | $191.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $186.3M | $170.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $215.2M | $198.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-6.9M | $12.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $17.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $871.0K | $9.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.2M | $33.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.2M | $19.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-18.4M | $8.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.4M | $7.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6M | $21.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 22.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 22.9% |
| Q4 25 | -3.7% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 20.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.9% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.1% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.7% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | 15.8% |
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.7% | 13.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.0% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.4% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.8% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 10.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.86 | $0.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | $0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.70 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.86 | $0.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.21 | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.42 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.43 | $0.31 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $13.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $378.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $107.8M | $517.1M |
| Total Assets | $464.3M | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.73× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $13.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $23.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $22.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $378.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $448.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $107.8M | $517.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $113.2M | $502.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.6M | $481.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $113.2M | $479.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.3M | $448.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.6M | $425.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $154.8M | $418.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $157.7M | $409.0M |
| Q4 25 | $464.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $457.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $437.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $462.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $467.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $484.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $518.7M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.6M | $79.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $767.0K | $50.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.4% | 19.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.0% | 11.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 6.31× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $11.9M | $99.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.6M | $79.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9M | $49.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.0M | $56.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.5M | $60.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.4M | $-13.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | $26.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-19.6M | $18.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.3M | $38.4M |
| Q4 25 | $767.0K | $50.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | $13.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.1M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.0M | $39.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-20.4M | $-36.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.2M | $-34.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.0M | $26.5M |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.5% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | 16.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.4% | -17.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | -6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.4% | -20.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.3% | 13.4% |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 18.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 31.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 20.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 30.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 6.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.31× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.01× | 2.77× | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.59× | 5.87× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.82× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.69× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.02× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.39× | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.56× | 1.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.