vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Citi Trends Inc (CTRN) and Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Citi Trends Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($197.1M vs $120.4M, roughly 1.6× Hippo Holdings Inc.). Hippo Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs -3.5%, a 8.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hippo Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.2% vs 10.1%). Hippo Holdings Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($9.1M vs $767.0K). Over the past eight quarters, Hippo Holdings Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (18.9% CAGR vs -4.3%).
Citi Trends, Inc. is an American retail clothing chain selling discounted products targeted primarily at African-American customers.
Hippo Valley Estate is a sugar estate found near the town of Chiredzi in Chiredzi District of southeastern Zimbabwe, on the Runde River near the border with Mozambique.
CTRN vs HIPO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $197.1M | $120.4M |
| Net Profit | $-6.9M | $6.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -3.7% | 5.6% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | 5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.1% | 18.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.6% | -86.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.86 | $0.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $197.1M | $120.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.8M | $120.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $201.7M | $117.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $211.2M | $110.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $179.1M | $101.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $176.6M | $95.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $186.3M | $89.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $215.2M | $85.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-6.9M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $98.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $871.0K | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.2M | $-47.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.2M | $44.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-18.4M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.4M | $-40.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6M | $-35.7M |
| Q4 25 | -3.7% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 81.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | -41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.9% | 46.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.1% | -5.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.7% | -40.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | -38.7% |
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 81.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.7% | -43.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.0% | 43.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.4% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.8% | -45.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | -42.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.86 | $0.31 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | $3.77 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | $0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.70 | $-1.91 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.86 | $1.81 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.21 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.42 | $-1.64 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.43 | $-1.47 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $218.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $107.8M | $436.1M |
| Total Assets | $464.3M | $1.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $218.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $247.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $198.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $140.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $197.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $191.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $175.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $223.4M |
| Q4 25 | $107.8M | $436.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $113.2M | $421.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.6M | $332.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $113.2M | $322.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.3M | $362.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.6M | $326.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $154.8M | $322.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $157.7M | $351.2M |
| Q4 25 | $464.3M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $457.4M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $437.4M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $462.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $467.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $484.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $518.7M | $1.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.6M | $9.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $767.0K | $9.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.4% | 7.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.0% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $11.9M | $14.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.6M | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9M | $16.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.0M | $24.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.5M | $-35.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.4M | $47.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | $46.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-19.6M | $-10.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.3M | $17.7M |
| Q4 25 | $767.0K | $9.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | $16.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.1M | $24.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.0M | $-35.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-20.4M | $47.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.2M | $-10.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.0M | $17.6M |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.5% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | -32.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.4% | 46.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.4% | -11.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.3% | 20.7% |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.01× | 0.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.59× | 19.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.56× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
