vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Citi Trends Inc (CTRN) and PAMT CORP (PAMT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Citi Trends Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($197.1M vs $141.3M, roughly 1.4× PAMT CORP). Citi Trends Inc runs the higher net margin — -3.5% vs -20.7%, a 17.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Citi Trends Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.1% vs -15.1%). Citi Trends Inc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($767.0K vs $-25.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Citi Trends Inc's revenue compounded faster (-4.3% CAGR vs -12.0%).
Citi Trends, Inc. is an American retail clothing chain selling discounted products targeted primarily at African-American customers.
CTRN vs PAMT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $197.1M | $141.3M |
| Net Profit | $-6.9M | $-29.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -3.7% | -27.0% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | -20.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.1% | -15.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.6% | 7.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.86 | $-1.38 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $197.1M | $141.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.8M | $150.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $201.7M | $151.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $211.2M | $155.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $179.1M | $166.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $176.6M | $182.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $186.3M | $182.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $215.2M | $182.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-6.9M | $-29.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $-5.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $871.0K | $-9.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.2M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.2M | $-31.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-18.4M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.4M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6M | $281.0K |
| Q4 25 | -3.7% | -27.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | -3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | -7.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | -5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.9% | -22.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.1% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.7% | -0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | -0.4% |
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | -20.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | -3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | -6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.7% | -5.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.0% | -19.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.4% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.8% | -1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.86 | $-1.38 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | $-0.46 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.70 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.86 | $-1.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.21 | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.42 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.43 | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $83.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $333.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $107.8M | $210.5M |
| Total Assets | $464.3M | $697.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.59× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $83.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $117.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $102.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $110.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $92.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $114.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $125.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $333.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $325.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $107.8M | $210.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $113.2M | $239.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.6M | $244.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $113.2M | $269.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.3M | $277.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.6M | $308.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $154.8M | $306.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $157.7M | $314.6M |
| Q4 25 | $464.3M | $697.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $457.4M | $715.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $437.4M | $707.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $462.8M | $712.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $467.1M | $741.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.7M | $756.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $484.1M | $733.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $518.7M | $746.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.59× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.6M | $-5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $767.0K | $-25.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.4% | -17.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.0% | 13.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $11.9M | $-23.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.6M | $-5.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.0M | $12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.5M | $5.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.4M | $15.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | $15.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-19.6M | $18.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.3M | $9.6M |
| Q4 25 | $767.0K | $-25.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.1M | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.0M | $-6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-20.4M | $-39.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | $-33.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.2M | $4.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.0M | $-12.2M |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | -17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.5% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | -4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.4% | -24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | -18.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.3% | -6.7% |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 33.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 12.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.01× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.59× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.56× | 34.11× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTRN
Segment breakdown not available.
PAMT
| Freight Transportation Service | $123.1M | 87% |
| Fuel Surcharge | $18.2M | 13% |
