vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Citi Trends Inc (CTRN) and Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Perella Weinberg Partners is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($219.2M vs $197.1M, roughly 1.1× Citi Trends Inc). Perella Weinberg Partners runs the higher net margin — 6.3% vs -3.5%, a 9.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Citi Trends Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.1% vs -2.9%). Perella Weinberg Partners produced more free cash flow last quarter ($30.5M vs $767.0K). Over the past eight quarters, Perella Weinberg Partners's revenue compounded faster (46.5% CAGR vs -4.3%).
Citi Trends, Inc. is an American retail clothing chain selling discounted products targeted primarily at African-American customers.
PJT Partners, Inc. is a global advisory-focused investment bank, founded in October 2015 as part of The Blackstone Group's spin-off of its financial and strategic advisory services businesses.
CTRN vs PWP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $197.1M | $219.2M |
| Net Profit | $-6.9M | $13.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -3.7% | 8.5% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | 6.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.1% | -2.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.86 | $0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $197.1M | $219.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.8M | $164.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $201.7M | $155.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $211.2M | $211.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $179.1M | $225.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $176.6M | $278.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $186.3M | $272.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $215.2M | $102.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-6.9M | $13.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $6.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $871.0K | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.2M | $17.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-18.4M | $16.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.4M | $-66.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6M | $-35.8M |
| Q4 25 | -3.7% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.1% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.7% | -30.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | -52.4% |
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.7% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.4% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.8% | -24.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | -35.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.86 | $0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | $0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.70 | $0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.86 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.21 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.42 | $-1.21 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.43 | $-0.91 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $255.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $107.8M | $-127.4M |
| Total Assets | $464.3M | $797.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $255.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $185.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $145.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $111.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $407.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $335.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $185.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $156.7M |
| Q4 25 | $107.8M | $-127.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $113.2M | $-302.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.6M | $-318.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $113.2M | $-323.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.3M | $-421.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.6M | $-360.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $154.8M | $-283.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $157.7M | $161.9M |
| Q4 25 | $464.3M | $797.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $457.4M | $650.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $437.4M | $606.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $462.8M | $570.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $467.1M | $876.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.7M | $810.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $484.1M | $645.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $518.7M | $583.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.6M | $34.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $767.0K | $30.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.4% | 13.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.0% | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.52× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $11.9M | $-34.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.6M | $34.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9M | $59.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.0M | $56.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.5M | $-176.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.4M | $223.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | $200.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-19.6M | $90.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.3M | $-206.3M |
| Q4 25 | $767.0K | $30.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | $57.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.1M | $55.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.0M | $-177.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-20.4M | $207.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | $199.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.2M | $83.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.0M | $-214.8M |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | 35.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.5% | 35.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | -83.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.4% | 91.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 71.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.4% | 30.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.3% | -210.3% |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 8.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.52× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.01× | 9.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.59× | 20.50× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -10.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.56× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
