vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Citi Trends Inc (CTRN) and SMITH & WESSON BRANDS, INC. (SWBI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Citi Trends Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($197.1M vs $124.7M, roughly 1.6× SMITH & WESSON BRANDS, INC.). SMITH & WESSON BRANDS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 1.5% vs -3.5%, a 5.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Citi Trends Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.1% vs -3.9%). SMITH & WESSON BRANDS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($16.3M vs $767.0K). Over the past eight quarters, Citi Trends Inc's revenue compounded faster (-4.3% CAGR vs -4.8%).
Citi Trends, Inc. is an American retail clothing chain selling discounted products targeted primarily at African-American customers.
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (S&W) is an American firearm manufacturer headquartered in Maryville, Tennessee, United States.
CTRN vs SWBI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $197.1M | $124.7M |
| Net Profit | $-6.9M | $1.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 24.3% |
| Operating Margin | -3.7% | 3.3% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | 1.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.1% | -3.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.6% | -53.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.86 | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $197.1M | $124.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.8M | $85.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $201.7M | $140.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $211.2M | $115.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $179.1M | $129.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $176.6M | $88.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $186.3M | $159.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $215.2M | $137.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-6.9M | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $871.0K | $8.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.2M | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.2M | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-18.4M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.4M | $27.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6M | $7.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 28.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 35.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.7% |
| Q4 25 | -3.7% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | -3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 4.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.9% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.1% | -1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.7% | 17.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | 8.2% |
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | -4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.0% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.4% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.8% | 17.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 5.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.86 | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.70 | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.86 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.21 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.42 | $0.60 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.43 | $0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $22.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $107.8M | $363.2M |
| Total Assets | $464.3M | $548.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $18.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $25.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $26.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $39.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $35.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $60.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $47.4M |
| Q4 25 | $107.8M | $363.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $113.2M | $364.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.6M | $372.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $113.2M | $366.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.3M | $371.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.6M | $380.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $154.8M | $399.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $157.7M | $376.4M |
| Q4 25 | $464.3M | $548.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $457.4M | $554.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $437.4M | $559.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $462.8M | $578.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $467.1M | $587.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.7M | $571.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $484.1M | $577.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $518.7M | $570.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.6M | $27.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $767.0K | $16.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.4% | 13.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.0% | 8.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 14.22× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $11.9M | $21.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.6M | $27.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.0M | $40.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.5M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.4M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | $-30.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-19.6M | $43.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.3M | $25.2M |
| Q4 25 | $767.0K | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.1M | $33.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.0M | $-16.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-20.4M | $-10.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | $-35.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.2M | $38.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.0M | $7.0M |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | -14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.5% | 23.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | -13.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.4% | -8.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | -40.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.4% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.3% | 5.1% |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 13.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.22× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.01× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.59× | 4.73× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.68× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.57× | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.56× | 3.20× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
