vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cytosorbents Corp (CTSO) and GSI TECHNOLOGY INC (GSIT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cytosorbents Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.2M vs $6.1M, roughly 1.5× GSI TECHNOLOGY INC). GSI TECHNOLOGY INC runs the higher net margin — -49.7% vs -59.5%, a 9.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GSI TECHNOLOGY INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.2% vs 0.9%). Cytosorbents Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-4.9M vs $-8.2M). Over the past eight quarters, GSI TECHNOLOGY INC's revenue compounded faster (8.6% CAGR vs 1.3%).
CytoSorbents Corporation is a publicly traded company located in Princeton, New Jersey.
Triad GSI is an American voting machine vendor based in Xenia, Ohio. Their main products are election-related computer hardware and software for counting ballots, as well as voter registration.
CTSO vs GSIT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.2M | $6.1M |
| Net Profit | $-5.5M | $-3.0M |
| Gross Margin | 73.7% | 52.7% |
| Operating Margin | -47.5% | -113.7% |
| Net Margin | -59.5% | -49.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.9% | 12.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 27.4% | 25.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.09 | $-0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.2M | $6.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.5M | $6.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.6M | $6.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.7M | $5.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.2M | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6M | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.8M | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.0M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-5.5M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.2M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.5M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.6M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.8M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.3M | $1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.1M | $-4.3M |
| Q4 25 | 73.7% | 52.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 70.3% | 54.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 70.9% | 58.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 71.1% | 56.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 68.4% | 54.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 61.0% | 38.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 73.5% | 46.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 76.5% | 51.6% |
| Q4 25 | -47.5% | -113.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -30.2% | -49.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -37.6% | -34.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -44.5% | -38.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -37.1% | -74.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -56.1% | -122.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -40.4% | 23.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -51.8% | -87.6% |
| Q4 25 | -59.5% | -49.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -33.4% | -49.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.2% | -35.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -16.9% | -37.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -82.7% | -74.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -32.1% | -120.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -48.6% | 23.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -67.7% | -83.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.09 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.05 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.14 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.05 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.08 | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.11 | $-0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $6.2M | $70.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.9M | $83.6M |
| Total Assets | $44.2M | $98.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $6.2M | $70.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5M | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $22.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.6M | $13.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | $15.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7M | $18.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.5M | $21.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.6M | $14.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.9M | $83.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0M | $38.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.6M | $37.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.5M | $28.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1M | $29.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.4M | $33.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.4M | $38.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.6M | $36.0M |
| Q4 25 | $44.2M | $98.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.8M | $52.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.0M | $50.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.8M | $43.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.4M | $44.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.8M | $47.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $53.4M | $52.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $47.1M | $42.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.78× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.23× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.8M | $-7.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-4.9M | $-8.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -53.4% | -134.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 4.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-12.5M | $-12.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-4.8M | $-7.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6M | $-887.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.5M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.5M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.3M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.5M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.8M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.8M | $-7.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-4.9M | $-8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6M | $-906.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.5M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.5M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.4M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.6M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.8M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.9M | $-7.2M |
| Q4 25 | -53.4% | -134.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.3% | -14.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.1% | -27.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -39.7% | -28.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -26.3% | -66.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -30.4% | -76.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -54.4% | -92.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -54.2% | -139.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.78× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -3.96× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTSO
| Direct | $5.1M | 55% |
| Distributors And Strategic Partners | $4.2M | 45% |
GSIT
| Distribution | $5.6M | 92% |
| Other | $459.0K | 8% |
