vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cue Biopharma, Inc. (CUE) and Dominari Holdings Inc. (DOMH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dominari Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($30.1M vs $21.9M, roughly 1.4× Cue Biopharma, Inc.). Cue Biopharma, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 7.2% vs -438.1%, a 445.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cue Biopharma, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1292.3% vs 220.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Dominari Holdings Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (369.1% CAGR vs 257.5%).
Cue Biopharma is a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on developing novel targeted immunotherapies for cancer, autoimmune disorders, and inflammatory diseases. Its proprietary platform enables precise T-cell activity modulation, with core operations in North America and global pharma partnerships to advance lead product candidates through clinical trials.
CUE vs DOMH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $21.9M | $30.1M |
| Net Profit | $1.6M | $-131.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 9.0% | -8.9% |
| Net Margin | 7.2% | -438.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 1292.3% | 220.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 116.7% | -12426.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.05 | $-6.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $21.9M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1M | $50.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0M | $34.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $421.0K | $8.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6M | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | $6.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $1.4M |
| Q4 25 | $1.6M | $-131.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.4M | $125.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.5M | $16.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.3M | $-32.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.7M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.2M | $-6.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-12.3M | $-5.4M |
| Q4 25 | 9.0% | -8.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -353.4% | -3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -292.3% | -57.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2921.4% | -394.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -264.2% | -79.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -390.6% | -44.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -737.8% | -205.2% |
| Q4 25 | 7.2% | -438.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -346.6% | 246.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -287.1% | 48.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2911.4% | -400.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -259.6% | -104.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -382.7% | -99.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -719.1% | -398.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.05 | $-6.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | $7.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | $1.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.17 | $-3.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.17 | $-0.67 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.20 | $-1.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.25 | $-0.91 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $27.1M | $80.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $26.4M | $69.4M |
| Total Assets | $42.2M | $112.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $27.1M | $80.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7M | $176.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.5M | $28.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.1M | $18.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.5M | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.4M | $7.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.0M | $12.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $41.0M | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $26.4M | $69.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.2M | $210.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.2M | $88.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.6M | $42.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.5M | $39.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.4M | $38.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.6M | $42.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.0M | $47.7M |
| Q4 25 | $42.2M | $112.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.6M | $223.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.7M | $109.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.3M | $52.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.2M | $47.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.8M | $43.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.3M | $49.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $54.0M | $52.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.09× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.10× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.1M | $22.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.68× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.1M | $22.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.0M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4M | $-353.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.2M | $1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-36.3M | $-16.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.5M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.0M | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.8M | $-8.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-36.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -116.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1976.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -2309.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -225.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -376.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -573.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.68× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -15.65× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CUE
| Immuno Scape Collaboration And License Agreement | $9.5M | 43% |
| BI Collaboration And License Agreement | $8.1M | 37% |
| Other | $4.3M | 20% |
DOMH
| Chief Operating Decision Maker | $30.1M | 100% |
| Commissions | $458.0K | 2% |
