vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Curbline Properties Corp. (CURB) and Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Latham Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($100.0M vs $54.1M, roughly 1.8× Curbline Properties Corp.). Curbline Properties Corp. runs the higher net margin — 17.6% vs -7.0%, a 24.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Latham & Watkins LLP is an American multinational law firm. Founded in 1934 in Los Angeles, California, it is known for its litigation, corporate, and regulatory law practices.
CURB vs SWIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $54.1M | $100.0M |
| Net Profit | $9.6M | $-7.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 17.8% | -10.7% |
| Net Margin | 17.6% | -7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 14.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 76.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.08 | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $54.1M | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $48.6M | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.4M | $172.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.7M | $111.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $87.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.8M | $150.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $160.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $110.6M |
| Q4 25 | $9.6M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.4M | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.4M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.6M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-29.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.4M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-7.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 32.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 27.7% |
| Q4 25 | 17.8% | -10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.3% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.3% | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.6% | -4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -51.8% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.9% |
| Q4 25 | 17.6% | -7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.2% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.1% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.3% | -5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -33.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -51.8% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -7.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.08 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.09 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.10 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.15 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $289.6M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $423.2M | $279.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9B | $405.9M |
| Total Assets | $2.5B | $823.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.22× | 0.69× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $289.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $430.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $429.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $594.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $423.2M | $279.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $396.4M | $281.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.1M | $281.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.0M | $306.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $281.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $282.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $282.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $282.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $405.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $408.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $398.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $381.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $387.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $416.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $408.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $391.8M |
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $823.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $844.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $822.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $824.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $794.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $853.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $830.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $808.6M |
| Q4 25 | 0.22× | 0.69× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.21× | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.05× | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.05× | 0.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.72× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $124.6M | $23.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $14.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 14.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 9.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 13.04× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $38.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $124.6M | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.2M | $51.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.2M | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.4M | $-46.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $37.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $52.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-34.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $14.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $45.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $29.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-50.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-98.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $33.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $47.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-39.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -45.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -36.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.8% |
| Q4 25 | 13.04× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.19× | 6.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.28× | 2.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.32× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.95× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CURB
Segment breakdown not available.
SWIM
| In Ground Swimming Pools | $50.2M | 50% |
| Covers | $37.0M | 37% |
| Liners | $12.7M | 13% |
