vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CuriosityStream Inc. (CURI) and PEOPLES BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA INC (PEBK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PEOPLES BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($21.5M vs $19.2M, roughly 1.1× CuriosityStream Inc.). PEOPLES BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA INC runs the higher net margin — 30.8% vs -19.7%, a 50.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CuriosityStream Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.8% vs 5.6%). PEOPLES BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($20.0M vs $3.9M). Over the past eight quarters, CuriosityStream Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (26.5% CAGR vs 4.2%).
Curiosity Stream Inc., formerly branded as CuriosityStream, is an American media company and over-the-top subscription video streaming service which offers documentary programming including films, series, and TV shows. The company offers a video on demand subscription service branded as "Curiosity Stream" and a linear broadcast television channel known as the Curiosity Channel through various services including FuboTV and The Roku Channel.
PEOPLES BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA INC is a regional bank holding company headquartered in North Carolina, U.S. It offers a full suite of personal and commercial banking services including deposit accounts, consumer and business loans, mortgage services, and wealth management solutions, primarily serving local residents, small and medium-sized enterprises, and community organizations across its operating areas in North Carolina.
CURI vs PEBK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $19.2M | $21.5M |
| Net Profit | $-3.8M | $6.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -17.6% | 40.7% |
| Net Margin | -19.7% | 30.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 35.8% | 5.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -34.6% | 86.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | $1.21 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $19.2M | $21.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.4M | $21.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.0M | $20.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.1M | $20.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.1M | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.6M | $20.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.4M | $20.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.0M | $19.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.8M | $6.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.7M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $784.0K | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $319.0K | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.8M | $3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.1M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.0M | $4.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.0M | $3.9M |
| Q4 25 | -17.6% | 40.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -24.5% | 22.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | 32.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 28.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.4% | 22.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -25.8% | 26.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -20.6% | 31.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -30.4% | 23.9% |
| Q4 25 | -19.7% | 30.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.4% | 17.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 21.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -19.9% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -24.3% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.4% | 24.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -42.0% | 19.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.07 | $1.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.06 | $0.67 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | $0.95 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.01 | $0.79 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.05 | $0.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | $0.72 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.04 | $0.89 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.09 | $0.72 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $27.3M | $58.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $41.5M | $157.1M |
| Total Assets | $75.7M | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $27.3M | $58.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.1M | $59.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.2M | $73.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $41.5M | $157.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.2M | $149.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.8M | $144.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.1M | $138.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.8M | $130.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.2M | $136.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.8M | $124.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $67.0M | $121.1M |
| Q4 25 | $75.7M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.7M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.7M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $85.3M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $86.2M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.6M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $94.6M | $1.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.0M | $21.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.9M | $20.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 20.5% | 92.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 6.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.22× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $34.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.0M | $21.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4M | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | $5.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0M | $20.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3M | $4.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2M | $6.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $666.0K | $3.7M |
| Q4 25 | $3.9M | $20.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8M | $5.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $20.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | 20.5% | 92.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.2% | 25.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 98.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 32.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 17.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.22× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | 1.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.03× | 1.36× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.93× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
