vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of CVR ENERGY INC (CVI) and CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

CVR ENERGY INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.8× CHART INDUSTRIES INC). CHART INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs -8.1%, a 13.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CVR ENERGY INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.3% vs -2.5%). CHART INDUSTRIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($66.2M vs $21.0M). Over the past eight quarters, CHART INDUSTRIES INC's revenue compounded faster (6.6% CAGR vs 0.3%).

CVR Energy Inc is a United States-based energy holding company operating two core segments: petroleum refining and nitrogen fertilizer manufacturing. It produces a wide range of products including gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, and agricultural fertilizers, primarily serving commercial, industrial and agricultural customers across North America.

Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.

CVI vs GTLS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
CVI
CVI
1.8× larger
CVI
$2.0B
$1.1B
GTLS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
CVI
CVI
+22.7% gap
CVI
20.3%
-2.5%
GTLS
Higher net margin
GTLS
GTLS
13.0% more per $
GTLS
5.0%
-8.1%
CVI
More free cash flow
GTLS
GTLS
$45.2M more FCF
GTLS
$66.2M
$21.0M
CVI
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
GTLS
GTLS
Annualised
GTLS
6.6%
0.3%
CVI

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
CVI
CVI
GTLS
GTLS
Revenue
$2.0B
$1.1B
Net Profit
$-160.0M
$53.6M
Gross Margin
-5.2%
33.3%
Operating Margin
11.6%
Net Margin
-8.1%
5.0%
Revenue YoY
20.3%
-2.5%
Net Profit YoY
-56.1%
-32.7%
EPS (diluted)
$-1.91
$1.06

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CVI
CVI
GTLS
GTLS
Q1 26
$2.0B
Q4 25
$1.8B
$1.1B
Q3 25
$1.9B
$1.1B
Q2 25
$1.8B
$1.1B
Q1 25
$1.6B
$1.0B
Q4 24
$1.9B
$1.1B
Q3 24
$1.8B
$1.1B
Q2 24
$2.0B
$1.0B
Net Profit
CVI
CVI
GTLS
GTLS
Q1 26
$-160.0M
Q4 25
$-110.0M
$53.6M
Q3 25
$374.0M
$-138.5M
Q2 25
$-114.0M
$76.1M
Q1 25
$-123.0M
$49.5M
Q4 24
$28.0M
$79.6M
Q3 24
$-124.0M
$69.0M
Q2 24
$21.0M
$58.6M
Gross Margin
CVI
CVI
GTLS
GTLS
Q1 26
-5.2%
Q4 25
-3.1%
33.3%
Q3 25
28.8%
34.1%
Q2 25
-3.7%
33.6%
Q1 25
-5.5%
33.9%
Q4 24
3.0%
33.6%
Q3 24
-3.9%
34.1%
Q2 24
2.9%
33.8%
Operating Margin
CVI
CVI
GTLS
GTLS
Q1 26
Q4 25
-5.3%
11.6%
Q3 25
26.3%
-8.0%
Q2 25
-5.8%
15.7%
Q1 25
-8.0%
15.2%
Q4 24
1.1%
17.0%
Q3 24
-6.2%
16.8%
Q2 24
1.4%
16.1%
Net Margin
CVI
CVI
GTLS
GTLS
Q1 26
-8.1%
Q4 25
-6.1%
5.0%
Q3 25
19.2%
-12.6%
Q2 25
-6.5%
7.0%
Q1 25
-7.5%
4.9%
Q4 24
1.4%
7.2%
Q3 24
-6.8%
6.5%
Q2 24
1.1%
5.6%
EPS (diluted)
CVI
CVI
GTLS
GTLS
Q1 26
$-1.91
Q4 25
$-1.09
$1.06
Q3 25
$3.72
$-3.23
Q2 25
$-1.14
$1.53
Q1 25
$-1.22
$0.94
Q4 24
$0.28
$1.57
Q3 24
$-1.24
$1.33
Q2 24
$0.21
$1.10

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CVI
CVI
GTLS
GTLS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$512.0M
$366.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$3.7B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$3.2B
Total Assets
$3.9B
$9.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.13×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CVI
CVI
GTLS
GTLS
Q1 26
$512.0M
Q4 25
$511.0M
$366.0M
Q3 25
$670.0M
$399.2M
Q2 25
$596.0M
$342.3M
Q1 25
$695.0M
$296.2M
Q4 24
$987.0M
$308.6M
Q3 24
$534.0M
$310.2M
Q2 24
$586.0M
$247.4M
Total Debt
CVI
CVI
GTLS
GTLS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$1.8B
$3.7B
Q3 25
$1.8B
Q2 25
$1.8B
Q1 25
$1.9B
Q4 24
$1.9B
$3.8B
Q3 24
$1.6B
Q2 24
$1.6B
Stockholders' Equity
CVI
CVI
GTLS
GTLS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$730.0M
$3.2B
Q3 25
$840.0M
$3.2B
Q2 25
$466.0M
$3.4B
Q1 25
$580.0M
$3.0B
Q4 24
$703.0M
$2.8B
Q3 24
$675.0M
$3.0B
Q2 24
$849.0M
$2.7B
Total Assets
CVI
CVI
GTLS
GTLS
Q1 26
$3.9B
Q4 25
$3.7B
$9.8B
Q3 25
$4.0B
$9.8B
Q2 25
$4.0B
$9.7B
Q1 25
$4.3B
$9.3B
Q4 24
$4.3B
$9.1B
Q3 24
$3.9B
$9.5B
Q2 24
$4.0B
$9.3B
Debt / Equity
CVI
CVI
GTLS
GTLS
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.40×
1.13×
Q3 25
2.17×
Q2 25
3.97×
Q1 25
3.29×
Q4 24
2.71×
1.33×
Q3 24
2.33×
Q2 24
1.86×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
CVI
CVI
GTLS
GTLS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$88.8M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$21.0M
$66.2M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
1.1%
6.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.5%
2.1%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.66×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$202.8M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
CVI
CVI
GTLS
GTLS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$0
$88.8M
Q3 25
$163.0M
$118.0M
Q2 25
$176.0M
$145.9M
Q1 25
$-195.0M
$-60.0M
Q4 24
$98.0M
$281.4M
Q3 24
$48.0M
$200.6M
Q2 24
$81.0M
$116.1M
Free Cash Flow
CVI
CVI
GTLS
GTLS
Q1 26
$21.0M
Q4 25
$66.2M
Q3 25
$125.0M
$94.7M
Q2 25
$135.0M
$122.0M
Q1 25
$-246.0M
$-80.1M
Q4 24
$43.0M
$260.9M
Q3 24
$14.0M
$174.5M
Q2 24
$38.0M
$88.0M
FCF Margin
CVI
CVI
GTLS
GTLS
Q1 26
1.1%
Q4 25
6.1%
Q3 25
6.4%
8.6%
Q2 25
7.7%
11.3%
Q1 25
-14.9%
-8.0%
Q4 24
2.2%
23.6%
Q3 24
0.8%
16.4%
Q2 24
1.9%
8.5%
Capex Intensity
CVI
CVI
GTLS
GTLS
Q1 26
1.5%
Q4 25
3.0%
2.1%
Q3 25
2.0%
2.1%
Q2 25
2.3%
2.2%
Q1 25
3.1%
2.0%
Q4 24
2.8%
1.9%
Q3 24
1.9%
2.5%
Q2 24
2.2%
2.7%
Cash Conversion
CVI
CVI
GTLS
GTLS
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.66×
Q3 25
0.44×
Q2 25
1.92×
Q1 25
-1.21×
Q4 24
3.50×
3.54×
Q3 24
2.91×
Q2 24
3.86×
1.98×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

CVI
CVI

Segment breakdown not available.

GTLS
GTLS

Repair Service And Leasing Segment$330.4M31%
Heat Transfer Systems Segment$325.8M30%
Specialty Products Segment$259.5M24%
Transferred Over Time$94.4M9%
Transferred At Point In Time$69.5M6%

Related Comparisons