vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CVR ENERGY INC (CVI) and Tapestry, Inc. (TPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tapestry, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.5B vs $1.8B, roughly 1.4× CVR ENERGY INC). Tapestry, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.4% vs -6.1%, a 28.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tapestry, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs -7.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Tapestry, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (29.9% CAGR vs -1.4%).
CVR Energy Inc is a United States-based energy holding company operating two core segments: petroleum refining and nitrogen fertilizer manufacturing. It produces a wide range of products including gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, and agricultural fertilizers, primarily serving commercial, industrial and agricultural customers across North America.
Tapestry, Inc. is a leading American multinational luxury fashion holding company. It owns three iconic lifestyle brands: Coach, Kate Spade New York, and Stuart Weitzman, offering premium handbags, apparel, footwear, accessories, and fragrances to global consumers via physical retail stores and e-commerce platforms.
CVI vs TPR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $2.5B |
| Net Profit | $-110.0M | $561.3M |
| Gross Margin | -3.1% | 75.5% |
| Operating Margin | -5.3% | 28.6% |
| Net Margin | -6.1% | 22.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | 14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -492.9% | 80.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.09 | $2.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $-110.0M | $561.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.0M | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-114.0M | $-517.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-123.0M | $203.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.0M | $310.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-124.0M | $186.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.0M | $159.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $82.0M | $139.4M |
| Q4 25 | -3.1% | 75.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.8% | 76.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.7% | 76.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.5% | 76.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 74.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.9% | 75.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | 74.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.6% | 74.7% |
| Q4 25 | -5.3% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.3% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.8% | -33.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.0% | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.2% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.6% | 13.8% |
| Q4 25 | -6.1% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.2% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.5% | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.8% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.4% | 9.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-1.09 | $2.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.72 | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.14 | $-2.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.22 | $0.95 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.28 | $1.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.24 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.21 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.81 | $0.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $511.0M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.8B | $2.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $730.0M | $551.2M |
| Total Assets | $3.7B | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.40× | 4.32× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $511.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $670.0M | $743.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $596.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $695.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $987.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $534.0M | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $586.0M | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $644.0M | $7.4B |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $7.7B |
| Q4 25 | $730.0M | $551.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $840.0M | $399.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $466.0M | $857.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $580.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $703.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $675.0M | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $849.0M | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $879.0M | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | $13.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.1B | $13.7B |
| Q4 25 | 2.40× | 4.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.17× | 5.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.97× | 2.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.29× | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.71× | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.33× | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.86× | 2.39× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.79× | 2.77× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $0 | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.0B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 41.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.0% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.93× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $0 | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $163.0M | $112.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $176.0M | $446.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-195.0M | $144.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $98.0M | $506.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.0M | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $81.0M | $256.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $177.0M | $97.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $125.0M | $80.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $135.0M | $411.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-246.0M | $113.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.0M | $475.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.0M | $93.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.0M | $209.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.0M | $78.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.9% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.2% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.0% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.5% | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.44× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.50× | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.86× | 1.61× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.16× | 0.70× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CVI
| Petroleum Segment | $1.6B | 91% |
| Product UAN | $64.0M | 4% |
| Product Ammonia | $51.0M | 3% |
| Renewables Diesel | $27.0M | 1% |
| Product Urea Products | $8.0M | 0% |
| Renewable Fuel Credits | $7.0M | 0% |
TPR
| Coach | $1.4B | 57% |
| Other | $787.0M | 31% |
| Kate Spade Company | $290.0M | 12% |
