vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CHICAGO RIVET & MACHINE CO (CVR) and ELBIT SYSTEMS LTD (ESLT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CHICAGO RIVET & MACHINE CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.0M vs $5.8M, roughly 1.0× ELBIT SYSTEMS LTD). ELBIT SYSTEMS LTD runs the higher net margin — 6.3% vs -19.3%, a 25.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. ELBIT SYSTEMS LTD produced more free cash flow last quarter ($319.6K vs $24.3K).
Chicago Pneumatic, also known as "CP", is an industrial manufacturer providing power tools, air compressors, generators, light towers and hydraulic equipment. Products are sold in more than 150 countries through a worldwide distribution network. CP is active on markets such as tools for industrial production, vehicle service, maintenance repair operation for mining, construction, infrastructure equipment.
Elbit Systems Ltd. is an Israel-based international military technology company and defense contractor. Founded in 1966 by Elron, Elbit Systems is the primary provider of the Israeli military's land-based equipment and unmanned aerial vehicles. It is an important company within the defense industry of Israel.
CVR vs ESLT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.0M | $5.8M |
| Net Profit | $-1.2M | $367.1K |
| Gross Margin | 2.7% | 24.3% |
| Operating Margin | -15.3% | 8.3% |
| Net Margin | -19.3% | 6.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 45.9% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 68.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $7.85 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.4M | $5.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.6K | $367.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-395.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $401.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $142.1K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-698.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.1% | 24.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -43.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | -15.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -86.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | -19.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -88.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -20.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.85 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.7M | $265.4K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $90.7K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $18.8M | $3.3M |
| Total Assets | $23.3M | $11.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.03× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7M | $265.4K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $765.6K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $90.7K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $18.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.0M | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $23.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | $11.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $116.4K | $534.6K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $24.3K | $319.6K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.4% | 5.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | 3.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.46× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-1.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $116.4K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $638.0K | $534.6K | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.2K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-60.1K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-58.2K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $363.5K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-398.8K | — |
| Q4 25 | $24.3K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $492.1K | $319.6K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-22.8K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-118.1K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-368.9K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-491.8K | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -28.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.44× | 1.46× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.01× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.56× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CVR
| Fastener | $5.1M | 85% |
| Other | $890.7K | 15% |
ESLT
Segment breakdown not available.
