vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CHICAGO RIVET & MACHINE CO (CVR) and QUICKLOGIC Corp (QUIK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CHICAGO RIVET & MACHINE CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.0M vs $5.7M, roughly 1.1× QUICKLOGIC Corp). QUICKLOGIC Corp runs the higher net margin — -5.4% vs -19.3%, a 14.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CHICAGO RIVET & MACHINE CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (45.9% vs -24.1%). CHICAGO RIVET & MACHINE CO produced more free cash flow last quarter ($24.3K vs $-1.2M). Over the past eight quarters, QUICKLOGIC Corp's revenue compounded faster (17.2% CAGR vs -12.7%).
Chicago Pneumatic, also known as "CP", is an industrial manufacturer providing power tools, air compressors, generators, light towers and hydraulic equipment. Products are sold in more than 150 countries through a worldwide distribution network. CP is active on markets such as tools for industrial production, vehicle service, maintenance repair operation for mining, construction, infrastructure equipment.
QuickLogic Corp is a fabless semiconductor company developing low-power customizable FPGAs, embedded FPGA IP, and edge sensor processing solutions. Its offerings serve global wearables, IoT, mobile electronics, and industrial markets, enabling energy-efficient low-latency on-device processing for edge AI and sensing use cases.
CVR vs QUIK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.0M | $5.7M |
| Net Profit | $-1.2M | $-305.0K |
| Gross Margin | 2.7% | 62.7% |
| Operating Margin | -15.3% | 2.6% |
| Net Margin | -19.3% | -5.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 45.9% | -24.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 68.0% | -114.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0M | $4.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.1M | $4.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.9M | $5.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.6K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-395.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $401.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.6M | $-305.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.4M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $142.1K | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-698.0K | $108.0K |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -43.7% | 62.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | 59.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.6% | 54.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | 67.1% |
| Q4 25 | -15.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -86.4% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.8% | -38.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | -29.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.5% | 2.3% |
| Q4 25 | -19.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -88.0% | -5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -20.8% | -49.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | -37.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.9% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.7M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $18.8M | $24.9M |
| Total Assets | $23.3M | $51.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.12× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $765.6K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4M |
| Q4 25 | $18.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.0M | $24.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.7M | $20.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.2M | $21.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.2M | $22.2M |
| Q4 25 | $23.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.4M | $51.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.4M | $49.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.3M | $47.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.8M | $51.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | 0.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.06× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.06× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $116.4K | $116.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $24.3K | $-1.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.4% | -20.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | 22.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-1.6M | $-5.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $116.4K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $638.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.2K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-60.1K | $116.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-58.2K | $-16.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $363.5K | $-220.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-398.8K | $147.0K |
| Q4 25 | $24.3K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $492.1K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-22.8K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-118.1K | $-1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-368.9K | $-83.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0K | $-4.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-491.8K | $62.0K |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -28.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.9% | -20.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.3% | -2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | -102.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.3% | 1.1% |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 22.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.5% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.8% | 96.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.2% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.44× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.01× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.56× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.36× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CVR
| Fastener | $5.1M | 85% |
| Other | $890.7K | 15% |
QUIK
| North America | $3.0M | 53% |
| Other | $2.7M | 47% |
