vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CHICAGO RIVET & MACHINE CO (CVR) and RAVE RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. (RAVE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CHICAGO RIVET & MACHINE CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.0M vs $3.0M, roughly 2.0× RAVE RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.). RAVE RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. runs the higher net margin — 20.9% vs -19.3%, a 40.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CHICAGO RIVET & MACHINE CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (45.9% vs 6.0%). RAVE RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($297.0K vs $24.3K). Over the past eight quarters, RAVE RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (1.3% CAGR vs -12.7%).
Chicago Pneumatic, also known as "CP", is an industrial manufacturer providing power tools, air compressors, generators, light towers and hydraulic equipment. Products are sold in more than 150 countries through a worldwide distribution network. CP is active on markets such as tools for industrial production, vehicle service, maintenance repair operation for mining, construction, infrastructure equipment.
RAVE Restaurant Group, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered restaurant franchising and operation enterprise, owning well-known casual dining brands including Pizza Inn and Pie Five Pizza. It offers pizza, pasta, salads and supporting menu items, primarily operates in the North American market with both company-owned and franchised outlets, targeting consumers looking for affordable, family-friendly casual meal options.
CVR vs RAVE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.0M | $3.0M |
| Net Profit | $-1.2M | $637.0K |
| Gross Margin | 2.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | -15.3% | 24.4% |
| Net Margin | -19.3% | 20.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 45.9% | 6.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 68.0% | 4.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $6.0M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.4M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.3M | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2M | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.1M | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.9M | $3.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | $637.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.6K | $645.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-395.0K | $847.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $401.0K | $722.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.6M | $607.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.4M | $526.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $142.1K | $880.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-698.0K | $654.0K |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -43.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | -15.3% | 24.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 23.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.7% | 38.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 32.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -86.4% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.8% | 20.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.5% | 28.8% |
| Q4 25 | -19.3% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 20.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.4% | 26.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | 24.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -88.0% | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -20.8% | 17.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 26.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.9% | 22.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.7M | $10.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $18.8M | $15.5M |
| Total Assets | $23.3M | $17.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $10.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7M | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $765.6K | $8.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2M | $8.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2M | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7M | $6.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $18.8M | $15.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.0M | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.0M | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.4M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.0M | $13.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.7M | $13.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.2M | $12.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.2M | $11.8M |
| Q4 25 | $23.3M | $17.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | $17.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.6M | $16.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.1M | $15.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.4M | $16.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.4M | $16.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.3M | $15.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.8M | $15.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $116.4K | $306.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $24.3K | $297.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.4% | 9.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.48× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-1.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $116.4K | $306.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $638.0K | $608.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.2K | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.0M | $927.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-60.1K | $711.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-58.2K | $530.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $363.5K | $1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-398.8K | $1.0M |
| Q4 25 | $24.3K | $297.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $492.1K | $600.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-22.8K | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-118.1K | $667.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-368.9K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0K | $1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-491.8K | $996.0K |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 18.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.3% | 38.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -28.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.9% | 23.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 44.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.3% | 33.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.8% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.2% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.44× | 0.94× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.45× | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.01× | 1.28× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.56× | 1.72× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.57× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CVR
| Fastener | $5.1M | 85% |
| Other | $890.7K | 15% |
RAVE
| Pizza Inn Franchising | $2.8M | 92% |
| Other | $235.0K | 8% |
