vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CHICAGO RIVET & MACHINE CO (CVR) and Sensus Healthcare, Inc. (SRTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CHICAGO RIVET & MACHINE CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.0M vs $4.9M, roughly 1.2× Sensus Healthcare, Inc.). CHICAGO RIVET & MACHINE CO runs the higher net margin — -19.3% vs -64.1%, a 44.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CHICAGO RIVET & MACHINE CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (45.9% vs -62.2%). CHICAGO RIVET & MACHINE CO produced more free cash flow last quarter ($24.3K vs $-2.4M). Over the past eight quarters, CHICAGO RIVET & MACHINE CO's revenue compounded faster (-12.7% CAGR vs -31.9%).
Chicago Pneumatic, also known as "CP", is an industrial manufacturer providing power tools, air compressors, generators, light towers and hydraulic equipment. Products are sold in more than 150 countries through a worldwide distribution network. CP is active on markets such as tools for industrial production, vehicle service, maintenance repair operation for mining, construction, infrastructure equipment.
Sensus Healthcare, Inc. is a medical technology company that designs, manufactures and commercializes innovative non-invasive superficial radiation therapy systems. Its products are primarily used for treating non-melanoma skin cancers, keloids, and select cosmetic dermatology conditions, serving healthcare providers and clinical facilities worldwide.
CVR vs SRTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.0M | $4.9M |
| Net Profit | $-1.2M | $-3.2M |
| Gross Margin | 2.7% | 38.4% |
| Operating Margin | -15.3% | -63.8% |
| Net Margin | -19.3% | -64.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 45.9% | -62.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 68.0% | -304.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $6.0M | $4.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.4M | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.3M | $7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2M | $8.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $13.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0M | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.1M | $9.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.9M | $10.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.6K | $-943.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-395.0K | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $401.0K | $-2.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.6M | $1.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.4M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $142.1K | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-698.0K | $2.3M |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.1% | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | 39.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.9% | 52.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -43.7% | 54.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | 59.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.6% | 58.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | 62.5% |
| Q4 25 | -15.3% | -63.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | -37.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.7% | -26.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | -31.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -86.4% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.8% | 16.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.5% | 27.1% |
| Q4 25 | -19.3% | -64.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | -13.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.4% | -14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | -30.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -88.0% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -20.8% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 17.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.9% | 21.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.7M | $22.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $18.8M | $48.1M |
| Total Assets | $23.3M | $53.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $22.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7M | $24.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $22.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $765.6K | $19.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2M | $22.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2M | $22.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | $19.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7M | $14.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $18.8M | $48.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.0M | $51.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.0M | $52.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.4M | $53.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.0M | $55.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.7M | $54.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.2M | $52.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.2M | $51.2M |
| Q4 25 | $23.3M | $53.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | $58.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.6M | $58.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.1M | $60.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.4M | $62.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.4M | $59.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.3M | $58.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.8M | $57.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $116.4K | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $24.3K | $-2.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.4% | -47.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-1.6M | $332.0K |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $116.4K | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $638.0K | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.2K | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.0M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-60.1K | $-827.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-58.2K | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $363.5K | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-398.8K | $-8.2M |
| Q4 25 | $24.3K | $-2.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $492.1K | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-22.8K | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.1M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-118.1K | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-368.9K | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0K | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-491.8K | $-8.4M |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | -47.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 33.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.3% | 42.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -28.3% | -32.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.9% | -8.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.3% | 40.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 45.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.3% | -79.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.8% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.2% | 2.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.44× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.01× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.53× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.25× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.56× | 2.62× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -3.60× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CVR
| Fastener | $5.1M | 85% |
| Other | $890.7K | 15% |
SRTS
| Products | $2.8M | 57% |
| Other | $2.1M | 43% |
