vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CPI AEROSTRUCTURES INC (CVU) and Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CPI AEROSTRUCTURES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($19.4M vs $13.3M, roughly 1.5× Laird Superfood, Inc.). CPI AEROSTRUCTURES INC runs the higher net margin — 3.6% vs -13.2%, a 16.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Laird Superfood, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.0% vs -10.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs 0.9%).
CPI Aerostructures Inc., known as CPI Aero, is a contract aircraft component manufacturer based in Edgewood, New York.
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
CVU vs LSF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $19.4M | $13.3M |
| Net Profit | $691.8K | $-1.8M |
| Gross Margin | 20.3% | 34.1% |
| Operating Margin | 6.4% | -13.5% |
| Net Margin | 3.6% | -13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.8% | 15.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -28.8% | -341.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.04 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $19.4M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.3M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.4M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.8M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.4M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.8M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.1M | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | $691.8K | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1M | $-975.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.3M | $-362.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $-156.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | $971.5K | $-398.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $749.7K | $-166.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4M | $-239.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $168.2K | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | 20.3% | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.3% | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.4% | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.7% | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.0% | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.7% | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.6% | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.6% | 40.0% |
| Q4 25 | 6.4% | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.1% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.1% | -3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.7% | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.6% | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.4% | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.7% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.6% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.5% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | -10.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.08 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.11 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $5.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $0 | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $25.8M | $11.5M |
| Total Assets | $75.2M | $19.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.5K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $25.8M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.0M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.8M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.9M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.9M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.9M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.1M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.5M | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | $75.2M | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.1M | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.3M | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.4M | $21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.0M | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.9M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.2M | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $70.8M | $17.6M |
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.1M | $68.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -10.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -3.03× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-5.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.1M | $68.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.1K | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-596.3K | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.7M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | $339.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $715.1K | $305.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-591.7K | $642.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-960.5K | $-422.3K |
| Q4 25 | $-2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $211.1K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-599.8K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $586.9K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-746.9K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | -10.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -18.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -3.03× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.19× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.53× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.95× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.42× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.71× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CVU
| Government Subcontracts | $16.4M | 85% |
| Commercial Contracts | $2.3M | 12% |
| Prime Government Contracts | $725.8K | 4% |
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
