vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO) and FrontView REIT, Inc. (FVR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($29.6M vs $18.2M, roughly 1.6× FrontView REIT, Inc.). Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 10.3% vs 2.2%, a 8.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FrontView REIT, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.0% vs 4.4%).
Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc., headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina, is the largest independent Coca-Cola bottler in the United States.
CWCO vs FVR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $29.6M | $18.2M |
| Net Profit | $3.0M | $400.0K |
| Gross Margin | 34.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 9.1% | 24.9% |
| Net Margin | 10.3% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.4% | 12.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 91.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $18.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $29.6M | $16.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.1M | $16.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.6M | $17.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.7M | $16.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.4M | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $400.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8M | $-833.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.3% | -24.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.2% | -16.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | -5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.3% | -16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.18 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.34 | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.32 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.28 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.99 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $123.8M | $9.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $221.7M | $514.2M |
| Total Assets | $257.6M | $869.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $9.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $123.8M | $13.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $123.6M | $19.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $112.2M | $8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $107.9M | $3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $99.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $104.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $96.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $314.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $307.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $316.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $310.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $514.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $221.7M | $391.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $220.4M | $385.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $216.6M | $369.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $213.3M | $324.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $210.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $209.8M | $1.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $206.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $869.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $257.6M | $854.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $257.2M | $846.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $257.5M | $856.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $250.4M | $860.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $243.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $238.4M | $1.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $235.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.80× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.80× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.96× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.8M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 11.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.90× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $33.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.8M | $42.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.4M | $8.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.8M | $9.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.8M | $8.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-742.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -13.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.90× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.79× | 2.06× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.45× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.47× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.32× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.32× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CWCO
| Services Revenues | $10.5M | 35% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $8.5M | 29% |
| Operations And Maintenance | $8.4M | 28% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.9M | 7% |
FVR
Segment breakdown not available.