vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CaliberCos Inc. (CWD) and Nano Labs Ltd (NA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CaliberCos Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.1M vs $2.7M, roughly 1.5× Nano Labs Ltd). Nano Labs Ltd runs the higher net margin — 754.5% vs -188.3%, a 942.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
CaliberCos Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered alternative asset management firm focused primarily on real estate investments. It offers a diverse suite of investment vehicles covering commercial, residential, and industrial real estate assets, serving institutional investors, high-net-worth individuals, and retail clients across North America. It also delivers asset management, property operation, and value-add real estate development services to support consistent long-term returns for investors.
Weebit Nano is a public semiconductor IP company founded in Israel in 2015 and headquartered in Hod HaSharon, Israel. The company develops Resistive Random-Access Memory technologies. Resistive Random-Access Memory is a specialized form of non-volatile memory (NVM) for the semiconductor industry. The company's products are targeted at a broad range of NVM markets where persistence, performance, and endurance are all required. ReRAM technology can be integrated in electronic devices like weara...
CWD vs NA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.1M | $2.7M |
| Net Profit | $-7.7M | $20.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -196.6% | — |
| Net Margin | -188.3% | 754.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -52.5% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 32.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.95 | $1.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.1M | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1M | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.2M | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-7.7M | $20.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.3M | $-985.5K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $146.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.7M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -196.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -129.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -112.4% | -459.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -62.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -236.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -65.0% | -237.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -22.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -188.3% | 754.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -120.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -104.5% | -85.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -60.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -247.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -57.8% | -231.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -16.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.95 | $1.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.65 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.15 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.85 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-10.15 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.34 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.53 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.9M | $4.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $24.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3M | $106.5M |
| Total Assets | $135.4M | $159.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.23× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.9M | $4.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $683.0K | $50.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8M | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $24.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $24.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $22.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.3M | $106.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.9M | $86.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-15.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-12.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.7M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-745.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | $135.4M | $159.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.3M | $206.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $105.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $158.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.2M | $51.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $201.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.23× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-12.1M | $-8.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-8.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -312.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-12.1M | $-8.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.2M | $-7.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $555.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-74.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-8.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-15.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -312.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -620.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -443.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 133.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.41× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.51× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
