vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CaliberCos Inc. (CWD) and D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CaliberCos Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.1M vs $2.8M, roughly 1.5× D-Wave Quantum Inc.). CaliberCos Inc. runs the higher net margin — -188.3% vs -1538.0%, a 1349.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, D-Wave Quantum Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.2% vs -52.5%). Over the past eight quarters, D-Wave Quantum Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-2.7% CAGR vs -57.6%).
CaliberCos Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered alternative asset management firm focused primarily on real estate investments. It offers a diverse suite of investment vehicles covering commercial, residential, and industrial real estate assets, serving institutional investors, high-net-worth individuals, and retail clients across North America. It also delivers asset management, property operation, and value-add real estate development services to support consistent long-term returns for investors.
D-Wave Quantum Inc. is a quantum computing company with locations in Palo Alto, California and Burnaby, British Columbia. D-Wave claims to be the world's first company to sell computers that exploit quantum effects in their operation. D-Wave's early customers include Lockheed Martin, the University of Southern California, Google/NASA, and Los Alamos National Laboratory.
CWD vs QBTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.1M | $2.8M |
| Net Profit | $-7.7M | $-42.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 64.8% |
| Operating Margin | -196.6% | -1266.0% |
| Net Margin | -188.3% | -1538.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -52.5% | 19.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 32.2% | 50.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.95 | $-0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.1M | $2.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1M | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3M | $15.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.7M | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.2M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.0M | $2.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-7.7M | $-42.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.4M | $-140.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.3M | $-167.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.4M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.4M | $-86.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $146.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.7M | $-17.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.8M | $-17.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 64.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 71.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 63.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 92.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 63.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 63.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 67.3% |
| Q4 25 | -196.6% | -1266.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -129.6% | -741.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -112.4% | -856.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -62.7% | -75.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -236.8% | -876.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -65.0% | -863.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -22.9% | -710.6% |
| Q4 25 | -188.3% | -1538.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -120.2% | -3743.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -104.5% | -5406.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -60.7% | -36.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -247.6% | -3727.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -57.8% | -814.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -16.6% | -702.3% |
| Q4 25 | $1.95 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.65 | $-0.41 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.15 | $-0.55 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.85 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-10.15 | $-0.43 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.34 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.53 | $-0.11 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.9M | $884.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3M | $852.2M |
| Total Assets | $135.4M | $915.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.9M | $884.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.9M | $836.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $683.0K | $819.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $304.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3M | $178.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.3M | $852.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2M | $670.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.9M | $694.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-15.8M | $207.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-12.6M | $62.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.7M | $-21.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-745.0K | $-37.0M |
| Q4 25 | $135.4M | $915.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.6M | $865.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.3M | $843.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.6M | $325.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $105.5M | $199.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $158.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.2M | $61.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $201.5M | $48.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-12.1M | $-18.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-20.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -727.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 60.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-75.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-12.1M | $-18.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.6M | $-19.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.2M | $-15.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.7M | $-19.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $555.0K | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-74.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4M | $-14.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.5M | $-12.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-20.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-20.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-19.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-15.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-12.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | -727.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -536.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -518.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -131.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 46.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -687.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -504.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 60.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.51× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CWD
Segment breakdown not available.
QBTS
| Transferred Over Time | $2.4M | 89% |
| Other | $306.0K | 11% |
