vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CaliberCos Inc. (CWD) and Sensus Healthcare, Inc. (SRTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Sensus Healthcare, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.9M vs $4.1M, roughly 1.2× CaliberCos Inc.). Sensus Healthcare, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -64.1% vs -188.3%, a 124.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CaliberCos Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-52.5% vs -62.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Sensus Healthcare, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-31.9% CAGR vs -57.6%).
CaliberCos Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered alternative asset management firm focused primarily on real estate investments. It offers a diverse suite of investment vehicles covering commercial, residential, and industrial real estate assets, serving institutional investors, high-net-worth individuals, and retail clients across North America. It also delivers asset management, property operation, and value-add real estate development services to support consistent long-term returns for investors.
Sensus Healthcare, Inc. is a medical technology company that designs, manufactures and commercializes innovative non-invasive superficial radiation therapy systems. Its products are primarily used for treating non-melanoma skin cancers, keloids, and select cosmetic dermatology conditions, serving healthcare providers and clinical facilities worldwide.
CWD vs SRTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.1M | $4.9M |
| Net Profit | $-7.7M | $-3.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 38.4% |
| Operating Margin | -196.6% | -63.8% |
| Net Margin | -188.3% | -64.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -52.5% | -62.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 32.2% | -304.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.95 | $-0.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.1M | $4.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6M | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1M | $7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3M | $8.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.7M | $13.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3M | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.2M | $9.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.0M | $10.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-7.7M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.4M | $-943.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.3M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.4M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.4M | $1.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $146.0K | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.7M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.8M | $2.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 52.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 54.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 59.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 58.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 62.5% |
| Q4 25 | -196.6% | -63.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -129.6% | -37.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -112.4% | -26.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -62.7% | -31.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -236.8% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 16.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -65.0% | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -22.9% | 27.1% |
| Q4 25 | -188.3% | -64.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -120.2% | -13.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -104.5% | -14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -60.7% | -30.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -247.6% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -57.8% | 17.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -16.6% | 21.3% |
| Q4 25 | $1.95 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.65 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.15 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.85 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-10.15 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.12 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.34 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.53 | $0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.9M | $22.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3M | $48.1M |
| Total Assets | $135.4M | $53.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.9M | $22.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.9M | $24.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $683.0K | $22.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $19.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3M | $22.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6M | $22.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8M | $19.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | $14.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.3M | $48.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2M | $51.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.9M | $52.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-15.8M | $53.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-12.6M | $55.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.8M | $54.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.7M | $52.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-745.0K | $51.2M |
| Q4 25 | $135.4M | $53.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.6M | $58.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.3M | $58.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.6M | $60.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $105.5M | $62.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $158.6M | $59.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.2M | $58.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $201.5M | $57.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-12.1M | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-2.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -47.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $332.0K |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-12.1M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.6M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.2M | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.7M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $555.0K | $-827.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-74.0K | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4M | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.5M | $-8.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-8.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | -47.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 42.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -32.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -8.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 40.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 45.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -79.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.53× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.51× | 3.25× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.62× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -3.60× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CWD
Segment breakdown not available.
SRTS
| Products | $2.8M | 57% |
| Other | $2.1M | 43% |