vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. (CWK) and Roper Technologies (ROP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.9B vs $2.1B, roughly 1.4× Roper Technologies). Roper Technologies runs the higher net margin — 15.8% vs -0.8%, a 16.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Roper Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs 10.8%). Roper Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($507.0M vs $234.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Cushman & Wakefield Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (15.5% CAGR vs 10.5%).
Cushman & Wakefield Inc. is an American global commercial real estate and property management services firm. The company's corporate headquarters is located in Chicago, Illinois. It is named after co-founders J. Clydesdale Cushman and Bernard Wakefield.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
CWK vs ROP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.9B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $-22.4M | $331.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | 6.1% | 27.2% |
| Net Margin | -0.8% | 15.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.8% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -119.8% | 53.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.10 | $4.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-22.4M | $428.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.4M | $398.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.3M | $378.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | $331.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $112.9M | $462.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.7M | $367.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.5M | $337.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 69.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 69.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 68.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 69.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 69.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.9% | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 27.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.6% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.1% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.8% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | 19.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.87 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.10 | $3.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.22 | $3.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.25 | $3.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.01 | $3.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.49 | $4.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.14 | $3.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.06 | $3.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $784.2M | $382.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.7B | $9.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.0B | $18.8B |
| Total Assets | $7.7B | $34.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.40× | 0.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $382.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $784.2M | $297.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $634.4M | $320.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $618.2M | $242.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $623.2M | $372.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $793.3M | $188.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $775.4M | $269.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $567.3M | $251.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $18.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $19.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $20.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $19.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $19.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $18.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $34.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.7B | $34.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.7B | $34.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.6B | $33.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | $31.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | $31.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | $31.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3B | $29.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.40× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.45× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.57× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.70× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.73× | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.81× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.91× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $257.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $234.3M | $507.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.0% | 24.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.8% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $293.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $257.3M | $738.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $235.5M | $869.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.6M | $404.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-162.0M | $528.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.2M | $722.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $196.1M | $755.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.8M | $384.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $507.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $234.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $225.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $300.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-166.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $105.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $186.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.58× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.17× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | -85.26× | 1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.02× | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.82× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.61× | 1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CWK
| Equity Method Investment Nonconsolidated Investee Or Group Of Investees | $1.8B | 61% |
| Other | $1.1B | 39% |
ROP
Segment breakdown not available.
