vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP (CWT) and Bristow Group Inc. (VTOL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Bristow Group Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($377.3M vs $210.7M, roughly 1.8× CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP). CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP runs the higher net margin — 5.4% vs 4.9%, a 0.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Bristow Group Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.7% vs -3.3%). Over the past eight quarters, CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP's revenue compounded faster (16.6% CAGR vs 5.8%).
California Water Service Group (CWSG) is an American public utility company providing drinking water and wastewater services. It is the third-largest investor-owned publicly traded water utility in the United States, serving roughly two million people through its subsidiary companies in California, Hawaii, New Mexico and Washington. CWSG was formed in 1997 as a new holding company for California Water Service to expand into other states regulated by their own public utilities commissions, and...
Bristow Helicopters Limited is a British civil helicopter operator originally based at Aberdeen Airport, Scotland, which is currently a part of the U.S.-based Bristow Group which in turn has its corporate headquarters in Houston, Texas, U.S. In 2020, Bristow Group was merged with Era Helicopters, a large U.S.-based commercial helicopter operator that was previously a division of Era Aviation, with the two companies then continuing to use the Bristow name.
CWT vs VTOL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $210.7M | $377.3M |
| Net Profit | $11.5M | $18.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 12.2% | 8.5% |
| Net Margin | 5.4% | 4.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.3% | 6.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -41.0% | -42.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.19 | $0.61 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $210.7M | $377.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $314.1M | $386.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $256.2M | $376.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $182.7M | $350.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $217.8M | $353.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $306.2M | $365.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $226.7M | $359.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $154.9M | $337.1M |
| Q4 25 | $11.5M | $18.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.2M | $51.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $42.2M | $31.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3M | $27.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.5M | $31.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.7M | $28.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.6M | $28.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $69.9M | $6.6M |
| Q4 25 | 12.2% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.5% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.2% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.2% | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.8% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.8% | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.2% | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.3% | 6.8% |
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.5% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.9% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.8% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.9% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.1% | 2.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.19 | $0.61 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.03 | $1.72 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.71 | $1.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.22 | $0.92 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.31 | $1.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.03 | $0.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.70 | $0.96 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.21 | $0.23 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $51.8M | $286.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.5B | $671.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.7B | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $5.7B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.87× | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $51.8M | $286.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $76.0M | $245.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.5M | $251.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.5M | $191.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $50.1M | $247.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.6M | $200.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $37.3M | $178.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.8M | $140.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $671.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $675.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $705.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $701.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $689.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $629.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $594.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $544.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $984.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $931.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $891.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $899.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $849.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $820.7M |
| Q4 25 | $5.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.8B | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.87× | 0.63× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | 0.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.67× | 0.72× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.68× | 0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.67× | 0.77× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.66× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $47.9M | $76.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $47.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 12.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 7.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.17× | 4.17× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $56.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $47.9M | $76.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $167.3M | $23.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.9M | $99.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.4M | $-603.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.1M | $51.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.8M | $66.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $94.4M | $33.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.5M | $26.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $47.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-6.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $67.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-52.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-32.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-16.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-37.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -11.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 14.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 19.2% |
| Q4 25 | 4.17× | 4.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.73× | 0.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.16× | 3.12× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.88× | -0.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.50× | 1.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.68× | 2.34× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.33× | 1.20× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.38× | 4.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CWT
| Residential | $133.2M | 63% |
| Business | $47.7M | 23% |
| Public Authorities | $13.4M | 6% |
| Industrial | $6.9M | 3% |
| Non Regulated Services | $4.8M | 2% |
| Other Non Regulated Service | $1.2M | 1% |
VTOL
| Offshore Energy Services | $247.5M | 66% |
| Government Services | $100.1M | 27% |
| Other | $21.9M | 6% |
| Related Party | $7.8M | 2% |
