vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cycurion, Inc. (CYCU) and OLB GROUP, INC. (OLB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cycurion, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.5M vs $1.8M, roughly 2.0× OLB GROUP, INC.). OLB GROUP, INC. runs the higher net margin — -83.7% vs -141.2%, a 57.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cycurion, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-13.1% vs -35.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Cycurion, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-8.6% CAGR vs -28.7%).
OLB Group, Inc. is a global financial technology provider offering omnichannel payment processing solutions, e-commerce enablement tools, and digital banking services for small and medium-sized enterprises across North America, Europe, and key Asia-Pacific markets. Its core segments include merchant services, crypto payment integration, and cloud-based business management platforms.
CYCU vs OLB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.5M | $1.8M |
| Net Profit | $-5.0M | $-1.5M |
| Gross Margin | 12.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -141.7% | -83.7% |
| Net Margin | -141.2% | -83.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -13.1% | -35.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -546.8% | 67.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-11.09 | $-0.48 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.5M | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5M | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0M | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2M | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-5.0M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.1M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.3M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.2M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | $-4.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.1K | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $306.1K | $-2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-312.5K | $-2.4M |
| Q4 25 | 12.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -141.7% | -83.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -118.2% | -49.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -96.9% | -74.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -260.9% | -36.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.9% | -166.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | -52.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | -74.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.8% | -82.6% |
| Q4 25 | -141.2% | -83.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -81.5% | -50.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -136.1% | -93.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -264.8% | -46.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.5% | -167.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | -52.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.1% | -75.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.4% | -67.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-11.09 | $-0.48 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.59 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.15 | $-0.66 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.56 | $-0.47 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.56 | $-3.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.11 | $-0.92 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | $-1.49 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.02 | $-0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.3M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $20.1M | $4.6M |
| Total Assets | $33.5M | $12.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $29.3K | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.7K | $27.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $41.3K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $53.3K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.3K |
| Q4 25 | $20.1M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.1M | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.0M | $6.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.9M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5M | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.7M | $6.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.4M | $8.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.8M | $11.0M |
| Q4 25 | $33.5M | $12.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.3M | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.7M | $12.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.5M | $12.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.6M | $12.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9M | $15.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | $16.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1M | $18.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.3M | $-1.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-3.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -98.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-12.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-3.3M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.5M | $-115.5K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.6M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.7M | $-155.8K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-205.7K | $-2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-315.2K | $-376.7K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-578.0K | $-785.5K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-272.4K | $-424.7K |
| Q4 25 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-310.7K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-420.2K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-711.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-377.4K | — |
| Q4 25 | -98.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -66.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -94.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -72.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -9.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -14.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.18× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.71× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.89× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CYCU
Segment breakdown not available.
OLB
| Transaction And Processing Fees | $1.7M | 94% |
| Other | $99.2K | 6% |
