vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Danaos Corp (DAC) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Federal Realty Investment Trust is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($336.0M vs $262.2M, roughly 1.3× Danaos Corp). Danaos Corp runs the higher net margin — 49.9% vs 38.6%, a 11.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Federal Realty Investment Trust posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.7% vs 6.4%).
Danaos Corporation is a leading global containership ownership and management firm. It operates a large fleet of modern container vessels, providing long-term charter services to top international container liner operators across major global trade routes, supporting the efficiency and reliability of global supply chains.
Federal Realty Investment Trust is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers in the Northeastern United States, the Mid-Atlantic states, California, and South Florida.
DAC vs FRT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $262.2M | $336.0M |
| Net Profit | $130.9M | $129.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 47.9% | 53.8% |
| Net Margin | 49.9% | 38.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.4% | 8.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -7.3% | 103.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $7.12 | $1.49 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $336.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $336.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $322.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $262.2M | $311.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $309.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $311.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $303.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $246.3M | $296.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $129.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $129.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $61.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $130.9M | $155.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $63.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $65.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $61.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $141.2M | $112.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 53.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 53.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 34.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 47.9% | 65.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 35.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 35.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 34.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.8% | 53.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.9% | 50.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.3% | 37.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.49 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.49 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.12 | $1.78 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.72 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.74 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.70 | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.23 | $1.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $654.1M | $107.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.6B | $3.2B |
| Total Assets | $4.5B | $9.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.53× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $107.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $107.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $111.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $654.1M | $177.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $109.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $123.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $97.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $471.7M | $103.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $3.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $8.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $8.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.42× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
