vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Danaos Corp (DAC) and Savers Value Village, Inc. (SVV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Savers Value Village, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($426.9M vs $262.2M, roughly 1.6× Danaos Corp). Danaos Corp runs the higher net margin — 49.9% vs -3.3%, a 53.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Savers Value Village, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.1% vs 6.4%).
Danaos Corporation is a leading global containership ownership and management firm. It operates a large fleet of modern container vessels, providing long-term charter services to top international container liner operators across major global trade routes, supporting the efficiency and reliability of global supply chains.
Value Village Stores, Inc. was a Midwestern United States chain of retail stores aimed at the discount department-store market. Henry Horney, formerly of F.W. Woolworth Company founded a small, regional chain of discount stores located in the two states of Wisconsin and Illinois that opened in 1961 and operated into 1989. Horney also had a real estate company and often built small shopping malls adjoining the discount stores. The chain had no relation to the Savers Value Village chain of thri...
DAC vs SVV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $262.2M | $426.9M |
| Net Profit | $130.9M | $-14.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 47.9% | 8.5% |
| Net Margin | 49.9% | -3.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.4% | 8.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -7.3% | -164.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $7.12 | $-0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $426.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $262.2M | $417.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $370.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $402.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $394.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $246.3M | $386.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $354.2M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $392.7M |
| Q3 25 | — | $-14.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $130.9M | $18.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $21.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $141.2M | $9.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-467.0K | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-15.6M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 26.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 30.2% |
| Q3 25 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 47.9% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.8% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 5.2% |
| Q3 25 | — | -3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.9% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.3% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -4.0% |
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.12 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.23 | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $654.1M | $63.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $750.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.6B | $414.6M |
| Total Assets | $4.5B | $2.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.81× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $63.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $654.1M | $70.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $73.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $150.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $137.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $471.7M | $160.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $102.2M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $125.3M |
| Q3 25 | — | $750.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $414.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $423.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $413.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $421.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $432.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $419.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $395.0M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $313.1M |
| Q3 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $1.8B |
| Q3 25 | — | 1.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $21.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-6.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -1.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 6.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $25.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $21.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $54.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $419.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $55.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $23.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $60.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-5.8M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $50.6M |
| Q3 25 | — | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $21.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-20.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $29.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-28.3M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $23.2M |
| Q3 25 | — | -1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -8.0% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 5.9% |
| Q3 25 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 7.0% |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DAC
Segment breakdown not available.
SVV
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $408.3M | 96% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $18.6M | 4% |
