vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dayforce (DAY) and Hello Group Inc. (MOMO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dayforce is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($481.6M vs $368.3M, roughly 1.3× Hello Group Inc.). Hello Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — 9.2% vs -40.9%, a 50.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, Dayforce's revenue compounded faster (9.8% CAGR vs -63.8%).
Dayforce, Inc., formerly Ceridian, is an American human resources software and services company.
Hello Sunshine is an American media company founded by actress Reese Witherspoon and Strand Equity founder and managing partner Seth Rodsky in 2016.
DAY vs MOMO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $481.6M | $368.3M |
| Net Profit | $-196.8M | $34.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 6.3% | — |
| Net Margin | -40.9% | 9.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.5% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -9940.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.23 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $368.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $481.6M | $372.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $464.7M | $365.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $481.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $465.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $440.0M | $381.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $423.3M | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $431.5M | $354.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $34.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-196.8M | $49.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.3M | $-19.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0M | $64.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.8M | $54.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $718.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 37.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 47.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.8% | 39.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.1% | 39.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 47.6% | 41.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.3% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.1% | 15.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 26.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.4% | 18.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -40.9% | 13.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | -5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 0.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.23 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.04 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $627.6M | $760.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $631.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | — |
| Total Assets | $8.7B | $2.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.23× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $760.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $627.6M | $588.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $625.2M | $700.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $557.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $579.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $494.1M | $470.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $465.4M | $819.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $392.5M | $834.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $631.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $631.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $632.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.5B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.0B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8B | $2.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.24× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.49× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.50× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $31.2M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.2M | $20.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $112.7M | $34.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $99.2M | $65.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.1M | $55.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $31.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $37.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $49.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 13.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.29× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.33× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.50× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.90× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.19× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.28× | 77.19× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DAY
| Dayforce Recurring | $333.0M | 69% |
| Cloud And Bureau Professional Services And Other | $78.5M | 16% |
| Float | $42.2M | 9% |
| Powerpay Recurring | $19.7M | 4% |
| Other Recurring | $8.2M | 2% |
MOMO
Segment breakdown not available.
