vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dayforce (DAY) and SM Energy Co (SM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SM Energy Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($704.9M vs $481.6M, roughly 1.5× Dayforce). On growth, Dayforce posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.5% vs -17.3%). Over the past eight quarters, SM Energy Co's revenue compounded faster (12.2% CAGR vs 9.8%).
Dayforce, Inc., formerly Ceridian, is an American human resources software and services company.
SM Energy Company is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Denver, Colorado.
DAY vs SM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $481.6M | $704.9M |
| Net Profit | $-196.8M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 6.3% | 25.9% |
| Net Margin | -40.9% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 9.5% | -17.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9940.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.23 | $0.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $704.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $481.6M | $811.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $464.7M | $792.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $481.8M | $844.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $465.2M | $852.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $440.0M | $643.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $423.3M | $634.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $431.5M | $559.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-196.8M | $155.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.3M | $201.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.9M | $182.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0M | $240.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.8M | $210.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $131.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 47.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 47.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.3% | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.1% | 37.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 33.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | 51.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 44.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.4% | 31.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -40.9% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 21.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 37.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.4% | 33.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 23.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.23 | $1.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.13 | $1.76 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.09 | $1.59 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | $1.63 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.01 | $2.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | $1.82 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.04 | $1.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $627.6M | $368.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $631.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $4.8B |
| Total Assets | $8.7B | $9.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.23× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $368.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $627.6M | $162.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $625.2M | $101.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $557.3M | $54.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $579.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $494.1M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $465.4M | $487.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $392.5M | $506.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $631.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $631.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $632.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4B | $3.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.7B | $9.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.5B | $9.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.5B | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.1B | $8.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1B | $8.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.0B | $6.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8B | $6.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.24× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.49× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.50× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $31.2M | $451.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $451.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.2M | $505.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $112.7M | $571.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.6M | $483.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.0M | $578.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.8M | $452.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $99.2M | $476.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.1M | $276.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.29× | 2.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.33× | 2.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.50× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.90× | 1.88× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.27× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.28× | 2.10× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DAY
| Dayforce Recurring | $333.0M | 69% |
| Cloud And Bureau Professional Services And Other | $78.5M | 16% |
| Float | $42.2M | 9% |
| Powerpay Recurring | $19.7M | 4% |
| Other Recurring | $8.2M | 2% |
SM
Segment breakdown not available.
