vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. (DCOM) and Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($123.8M vs $93.7M, roughly 1.3× Ranpak Holdings Corp.). On growth, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3040.1% vs 2.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (22.9% CAGR vs 13.7%).
The Dime Community Bank, originally known as the Dime Savings Bank of Williamsburgh, is a local, FDIC-insured bank headquartered in Hauppauge, New York. Founded in 1864, the bank was originally based in the Williamsburg neighborhood of Brooklyn, New York, and continues to operate with a strong market presence in this area. In 2017, Dime moved its headquarters to Brooklyn Heights. On Monday, February 1, 2021, Bridge Bancorp Inc. and Dime Community Bancshares successfully closed on a merger of ...
Ranpak Holdings Corp. manufactures machines and paper products used in protective paper-based packing for shipping goods and merchandise for e-commerce and industry, along with automation solutions. The company is based in Concord, Ohio, and has production facilities and offices in Reno, Nevada; Kansas City, Missouri; the Netherlands; Czech Republic; Shanghai and Singapore. The paper packaging material can be used for multiple applications like wrapping, cushioning, void fill and cold chain p...
DCOM vs PACK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $123.8M | $93.7M |
| Net Profit | — | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 39.0% |
| Operating Margin | 38.6% | -1.0% |
| Net Margin | — | — |
| Revenue YoY | 3040.1% | 2.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.68 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $123.8M | $93.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $115.6M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.7M | $77.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.8M | $77.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9M | $91.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.6M | $78.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.3M | $72.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $82.0M | $72.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.7M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.7M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.5M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.3M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.5M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.7M | $-8.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 39.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 39.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 44.6% |
| Q4 25 | 38.6% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.7% | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.6% | -12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.6% | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -433.6% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.8% | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.8% | -7.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.6% | -6.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.9% | -12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.1% | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.7% | -14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | -10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.2% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.6% | -11.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.68 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.59 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.64 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.45 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.58 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.29 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.43 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.41 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $63.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $401.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $534.9M |
| Total Assets | $15.3B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.75× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $49.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $49.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $65.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $76.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $69.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $65.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $55.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $401.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $403.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $405.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $406.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $403.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $396.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $396.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $534.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $537.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $539.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $544.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $548.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $564.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $566.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $560.0M |
| Q4 25 | $15.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.5B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.71× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $186.6M | $19.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $186.6M | $19.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.1M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.1M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.4M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $99.1M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-33.3M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.6M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.7M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -38.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.88× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.78× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.05× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.50× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.68× | 3.56× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.74× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DCOM
Segment breakdown not available.
PACK
| Other | $47.9M | 51% |
| Europe And Asia Segment | $45.8M | 49% |