vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DoubleDown Interactive Co., Ltd. (DDI) and JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
JBG SMITH Properties is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($127.6M vs $83.0M, roughly 1.5× DoubleDown Interactive Co., Ltd.). DoubleDown Interactive Co., Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 30.2% vs -35.7%, a 65.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DoubleDown Interactive Co., Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.7% vs -2.5%).
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. is an American video game holding company based in New York City founded by Ryan Brant in September 1993.
JBG SMITH PropertiesJBGSEarnings & Financial Report
JBG SMITH Properties is a publicly traded real estate investment trust based in Bethesda, Maryland.
DDI vs JBGS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $83.0M | $127.6M |
| Net Profit | $25.0M | $-45.5M |
| Gross Margin | 70.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 42.5% | -47.5% |
| Net Margin | 30.2% | -35.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.7% | -2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -7.0% | 24.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $10.11 | $-0.76 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $127.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $123.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $126.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $120.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $130.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.0M | $136.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.2M | $135.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $88.1M | $145.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-45.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-28.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-19.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-45.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-59.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.0M | $-27.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.2M | $-24.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.3M | $-32.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 70.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 69.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 68.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -47.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -27.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -18.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -44.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -53.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.5% | -22.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.0% | -24.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.2% | -30.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -35.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -23.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -15.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -37.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -45.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.2% | -19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.6% | -18.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.4% | -22.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.76 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.29 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.56 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.70 | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.11 | $-0.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.39 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.23 | $-0.36 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $372.7M | $75.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $37.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $815.5M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $879.8M | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.05× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $75.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $64.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $61.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $81.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $145.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $372.7M | $137.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $339.2M | $163.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $309.5M | $220.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $815.5M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $786.2M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $755.2M | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $879.8M | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $852.6M | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $831.0M | $5.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.05× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $31.8M | $73.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 38.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.27× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $129.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $73.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $18.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $129.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.8M | $26.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.4M | $23.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.9M | $37.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 39.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.27× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.15× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
