vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd (DDL) and BingEx Ltd (FLX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BingEx Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($143.2M vs $115.3M, roughly 1.2× Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd). Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd runs the higher net margin — 5.8% vs 2.2%, a 3.6% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd operates a leading on-demand grocery e-commerce platform primarily serving the Chinese market. It provides fresh produce, daily necessities, ready-to-eat meals, and household staples to urban consumers, leveraging optimized supply chains and localized logistics networks to offer fast, reliable 30-minute delivery services, prioritizing product freshness and user convenience.
DDL vs FLX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2022 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $115.3M | $143.2M |
| Net Profit | $6.7M | $3.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 10.8% |
| Operating Margin | 5.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 5.8% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $143.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $141.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $143.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $141.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $164.6M | ||
| Q3 22 | $115.3M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $136.7M | — | ||
| Q1 22 | $118.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $27.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 22 | $6.7M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $717.6K | — | ||
| Q1 22 | $10.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 22 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 22 | 8.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 22 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q1 22 | 8.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-0.00 | — | ||
| Q1 22 | $-0.03 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $113.7M | $561.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $135.8K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.5M | — |
| Total Assets | $178.3M | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.03× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $561.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $628.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $499.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $592.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $517.4M | ||
| Q3 22 | $113.7M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $124.9M | — | ||
| Q1 22 | $105.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $135.8K | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $322.0K | — | ||
| Q1 22 | $527.9K | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $4.5M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $8.5M | — | ||
| Q1 22 | $5.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $926.8M | ||
| Q3 22 | $178.3M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $194.3M | — | ||
| Q1 22 | $187.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q1 22 | 0.09× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
