vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd (DDL) and HOPE BANCORP INC (HOPE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HOPE BANCORP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($141.0M vs $115.3M, roughly 1.2× Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd). HOPE BANCORP INC runs the higher net margin — 20.9% vs 5.8%, a 15.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd operates a leading on-demand grocery e-commerce platform primarily serving the Chinese market. It provides fresh produce, daily necessities, ready-to-eat meals, and household staples to urban consumers, leveraging optimized supply chains and localized logistics networks to offer fast, reliable 30-minute delivery services, prioritizing product freshness and user convenience.
Bank of Hope is an American bank, based in Los Angeles, that focuses on the Korean American community. The bank was first established on December 30, 1980, under the name Wilshire Bank.
DDL vs HOPE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2022 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $115.3M | $141.0M |
| Net Profit | $6.7M | $29.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 5.8% | 20.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 21.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | $0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $141.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $145.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $141.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $94.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $116.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $118.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $116.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $116.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $29.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $30.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-24.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $21.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $24.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $25.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 26.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -27.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 29.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -26.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.23 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.27 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.17 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $113.7M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $135.8K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.5M | $2.3B |
| Total Assets | $178.3M | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.03× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $18.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $18.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $18.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $17.4B |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
