vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd (DDL) and Information Services Group Inc. (III). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($115.3M vs $61.2M, roughly 1.9× Information Services Group Inc.). Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd runs the higher net margin — 5.8% vs 4.4%, a 1.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd operates a leading on-demand grocery e-commerce platform primarily serving the Chinese market. It provides fresh produce, daily necessities, ready-to-eat meals, and household staples to urban consumers, leveraging optimized supply chains and localized logistics networks to offer fast, reliable 30-minute delivery services, prioritizing product freshness and user convenience.
EBSCO Information Services, headquartered in Ipswich, Massachusetts, is a division of EBSCO Industries Inc., a private company headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama. EBSCO provides products and services to libraries of many types around the world. Its products include EBSCONET, a complete e-resource management system, and EBSCOhost, which supplies a fee-based online research service with 375 full-text databases, a collection of 600,000-plus ebooks, subject indexes, point-of-care medical refere...
DDL vs III — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2022 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $115.3M | $61.2M |
| Net Profit | $6.7M | $2.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.3% | 8.2% |
| Net Margin | 5.8% | 4.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 82.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $61.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $61.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $62.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $61.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $59.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $57.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $64.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 44.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 42.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 40.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 39.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $113.7M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $135.8K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.5M | — |
| Total Assets | $178.3M | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.03× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $28.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $28.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $25.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $20.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $23.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $94.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $94.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $94.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $95.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $96.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $96.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $95.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $211.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $213.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $200.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $202.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $204.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $227.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $235.3M |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
