vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd (DDL) and IonQ, Inc. (IONQ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($115.3M vs $61.9M, roughly 1.9× IonQ, Inc.). IonQ, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 1217.8% vs 5.8%, a 1211.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd operates a leading on-demand grocery e-commerce platform primarily serving the Chinese market. It provides fresh produce, daily necessities, ready-to-eat meals, and household staples to urban consumers, leveraging optimized supply chains and localized logistics networks to offer fast, reliable 30-minute delivery services, prioritizing product freshness and user convenience.
IonQ, Inc. is an American quantum computing hardware and software company headquartered in College Park, Maryland. The company develops general-purpose trapped ion quantum computers and accompanying software to generate, optimize, and execute quantum circuits.
DDL vs IONQ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2022 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $115.3M | $61.9M |
| Net Profit | $6.7M | $753.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.3% | -369.4% |
| Net Margin | 5.8% | 1217.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 428.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 473.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | $2.60 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $61.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $39.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $20.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.4M | ||
| Q3 22 | $115.3M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $136.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $753.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-176.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-202.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-52.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-37.6M | ||
| Q3 22 | $6.7M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $717.6K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -369.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -423.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -776.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -661.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -428.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -430.0% | ||
| Q3 22 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 0.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1217.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2646.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -854.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1725.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -423.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -330.0% | ||
| Q3 22 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 0.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.60 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-3.58 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.70 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.95 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.18 | ||
| Q3 22 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-0.00 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $113.7M | $2.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $135.8K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.5M | $3.8B |
| Total Assets | $178.3M | $6.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.03× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $546.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $340.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $365.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $369.8M | ||
| Q3 22 | $113.7M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $124.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $135.8K | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $322.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $383.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $435.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $463.3M | ||
| Q3 22 | $4.5M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $8.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $6.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $508.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $497.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $517.4M | ||
| Q3 22 | $178.3M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $194.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 0.04× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-74.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-83.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -134.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 14.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.10× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-307.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-74.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-123.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-52.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-39.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-19.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-26.6M | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-83.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-127.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-53.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-43.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-23.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-34.1M | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -134.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -319.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -259.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -367.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -185.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -299.3% | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 30.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 65.8% | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DDL
Segment breakdown not available.
IONQ
| Other | $31.2M | 50% |
| Platform Consulting And Support Services | $30.7M | 50% |
