vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd (DDL) and MID PENN BANCORP INC (MPB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($115.3M vs $62.0M, roughly 1.9× MID PENN BANCORP INC). MID PENN BANCORP INC runs the higher net margin — 31.4% vs 5.8%, a 25.5% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd operates a leading on-demand grocery e-commerce platform primarily serving the Chinese market. It provides fresh produce, daily necessities, ready-to-eat meals, and household staples to urban consumers, leveraging optimized supply chains and localized logistics networks to offer fast, reliable 30-minute delivery services, prioritizing product freshness and user convenience.
Commerce Bancorp was a Cherry Hill, New Jersey–based bank created in 1973. In 2007, it was purchased by Toronto-Dominion Bank, which merged Commerce into TD Banknorth, the latter of which was rebranded to TD Bank.
DDL vs MPB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2022 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $115.3M | $62.0M |
| Net Profit | $6.7M | $19.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.3% | 43.6% |
| Net Margin | 5.8% | 31.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 30.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 47.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | $0.83 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $62.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $61.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $54.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $47.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $47.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $45.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $44.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $42.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $18.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 43.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 39.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 35.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 32.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 32.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 34.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 31.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 29.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 28.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 26.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.83 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.22 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.71 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.72 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.74 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.71 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.73 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $113.7M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $135.8K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.5M | $814.1M |
| Total Assets | $178.3M | $6.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.03× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $814.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $796.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $775.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $667.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $655.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $573.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $559.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $551.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $80.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $71.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 115.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 13.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.12× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $132.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $80.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $26.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $29.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $51.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $16.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $71.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $27.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $44.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $16.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $17.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 115.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 50.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 18.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 93.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 13.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.12× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.08× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.84× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.02× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
