vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd (DDL) and Nayax Ltd. (NYAX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($115.3M vs $78.1M, roughly 1.5× Nayax Ltd.). Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd runs the higher net margin — 5.8% vs -3.9%, a 9.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd operates a leading on-demand grocery e-commerce platform primarily serving the Chinese market. It provides fresh produce, daily necessities, ready-to-eat meals, and household staples to urban consumers, leveraging optimized supply chains and localized logistics networks to offer fast, reliable 30-minute delivery services, prioritizing product freshness and user convenience.
Nayax Ltd. is a global fintech company that offers cashless, telemetry, management, monitoring, and business intelligence (BI) products and services for the vending, unattended, and other retail industries.
DDL vs NYAX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2022 vs Q2 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $115.3M | $78.1M |
| Net Profit | $6.7M | $-3.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 44.3% |
| Operating Margin | 5.3% | 1.2% |
| Net Margin | 5.8% | -3.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 39.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 24.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | $-0.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 24 | — | $78.1M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $56.2M | ||
| Q3 22 | $115.3M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $136.7M | — | ||
| Q1 22 | $118.5M | — |
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-4.0M | ||
| Q3 22 | $6.7M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $717.6K | — | ||
| Q1 22 | $10.4M | — |
| Q2 24 | — | 44.3% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q2 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 22 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 22 | 8.2% | — |
| Q2 24 | — | -3.9% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -7.1% | ||
| Q3 22 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q1 22 | 8.8% | — |
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-0.12 | ||
| Q3 22 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-0.00 | — | ||
| Q1 22 | $-0.03 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $113.7M | $61.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $135.8K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.5M | $158.7M |
| Total Assets | $178.3M | $434.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.03× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 24 | — | $61.9M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $31.1M | ||
| Q3 22 | $113.7M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $124.9M | — | ||
| Q1 22 | $105.6M | — |
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $135.8K | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $322.0K | — | ||
| Q1 22 | $527.9K | — |
| Q2 24 | — | $158.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 22 | $4.5M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $8.5M | — | ||
| Q1 22 | $5.9M | — |
| Q2 24 | — | $434.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $261.8M | ||
| Q3 22 | $178.3M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $194.3M | — | ||
| Q1 22 | $187.7M | — |
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q1 22 | 0.09× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $9.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 24 | — | $9.2M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
