vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Easterly Government Properties, Inc. (DEA) and Repay Holdings Corp (RPAY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Easterly Government Properties, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($91.5M vs $78.6M, roughly 1.2× Repay Holdings Corp). Easterly Government Properties, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 1.5% vs -178.3%, a 179.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Easterly Government Properties, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.4% vs 0.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Easterly Government Properties, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (9.6% CAGR vs -1.3%).
Easterly Government Properties, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered real estate investment trust focused on acquiring, developing, and managing mission-critical commercial properties primarily leased to U.S. federal government agencies. Its portfolio covers office spaces, healthcare facilities, and security-related properties, serving government clients across key domestic markets.
Repay Holdings Corp is a leading payment technology provider delivering integrated end-to-end payment processing solutions for businesses across North America. Its offerings include credit/debit card processing, ACH transfer services, POS system integrations and digital payment tools, serving retail, healthcare, automotive and e-commerce segments to help clients streamline transaction workflows and boost operational efficiency.
DEA vs RPAY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $91.5M | $78.6M |
| Net Profit | $1.4M | $-140.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 74.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | -182.2% |
| Net Margin | 1.5% | -178.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 16.4% | 0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -56.9% | -3304.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.36 | $-1.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $91.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $87.0M | $78.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.2M | $77.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.2M | $75.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $78.7M | $77.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.3M | $78.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $74.8M | $79.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $76.2M | $74.9M |
| Q1 26 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.6M | $-140.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $-6.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $-102.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1M | $-7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.5M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.6M | $-4.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 77.3% | 74.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 76.0% | 74.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 77.2% | 75.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 77.4% | 75.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 76.1% | 76.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 77.7% | 77.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 76.2% | 78.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -182.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -138.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -4.6% |
| Q1 26 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | -178.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | -8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.8% | -135.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.0% | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.0% | -5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.5% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | -5.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.36 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.09 | $-1.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.02 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.09 | $-1.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.07 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.13 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.11 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.11 | $-0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.0M | $115.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $280.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3B | $484.4M |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.58× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $23.4M | $115.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4M | $95.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | $162.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $165.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.4M | $189.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.2M | $168.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8M | $147.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $280.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $279.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $279.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $497.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $496.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $496.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $435.6M |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $484.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $616.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $633.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $755.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $761.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $754.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $815.4M |
| Q1 26 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.26× | 0.58× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.23× | 0.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.29× | 0.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.20× | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.21× | 0.65× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.12× | 0.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.07× | 0.53× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $23.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $23.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 29.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.7% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $90.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $259.2M | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $155.0M | $32.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.1M | $33.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.2M | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.6M | $34.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.2M | $60.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.0M | $31.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $23.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $32.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $33.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $34.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $59.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $30.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 29.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 75.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.7% |
| Q1 26 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 56.44× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 127.75× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.36× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.73× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.82× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.76× | 18.52× | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.37× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DEA
| Rental income | $88.6M | 97% |
| Other | $2.3M | 3% |
| Asset management income | $646.0K | 1% |
RPAY
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $69.4M | 88% |
| Other | $6.8M | 9% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $2.3M | 3% |
