vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DIVERSIFIED HEALTHCARE TRUST (DHC) and USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC (USNA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DIVERSIFIED HEALTHCARE TRUST is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($379.6M vs $250.2M, roughly 1.5× USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC). USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC runs the higher net margin — 3.0% vs -5.6%, a 8.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DIVERSIFIED HEALTHCARE TRUST posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.0% vs -3.0%). Over the past eight quarters, USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC's revenue compounded faster (11.8% CAGR vs 1.2%).
GE Healthcare Technologies, Inc. is an American health technology company based in Chicago, Illinois. The company, which stylizes its own name as GE HealthCare, operates four divisions: Medical imaging, which includes molecular imaging, computed tomography, magnetic resonance, women’s health screening and X-ray systems; Ultrasound; Patient Care Solutions, which is focused on remote patient monitoring, anesthesia and respiratory care, diagnostic cardiology, and infant care; and Pharmaceutical ...
Usana Health Sciences, Inc., or USANA, is an American multi-level marketing company based in Salt Lake City, Utah. As of 2021, Usana was the 14th largest direct-selling company in the world by revenue. The company manufactures most of its nutritional products, dietary supplements, and skincare products at a Salt Lake City facility. Its products are sold in 24 countries via a network of independent distributors.
DHC vs USNA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2027
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $379.6M | $250.2M |
| Net Profit | $-21.2M | $7.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 76.2% |
| Operating Margin | -12.6% | 5.5% |
| Net Margin | -5.6% | 3.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.0% | -3.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 75.7% | -20.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.09 | $0.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $250.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $379.6M | $226.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $388.7M | $213.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $382.7M | $235.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $386.9M | $249.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $379.6M | $213.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $373.6M | $200.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $371.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-21.2M | $180.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-164.0M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-91.6M | $9.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.0M | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-87.4M | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-98.7M | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-97.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 76.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 78.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 77.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 78.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 79.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 82.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 80.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | -12.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -43.4% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -24.5% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -26.1% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -26.5% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -23.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -5.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -42.2% | -3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.9% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.3% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -26.4% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.09 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.68 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.38 | $0.52 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.04 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.37 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.41 | $0.56 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.41 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $105.4M | $162.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.7B | — |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $739.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.47× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $162.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $105.4M | $158.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $201.4M | $145.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.8M | $151.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $302.6M | $179.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $144.6M | $181.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $256.5M | $364.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $265.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $528.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $531.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $529.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $532.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $533.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $739.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $742.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7B | $726.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | $734.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.0B | $746.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | $748.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | $671.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-19.6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-166.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -43.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 38.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-280.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-19.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-49.3M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.0M | $12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.2M | $15.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $112.2M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.1M | $29.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-166.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-89.8M | $-5.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-42.9M | $12.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-89.5M | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-26.1M | $27.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -43.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.1% | -2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.9% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.1% | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.6% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.0% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.1% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.6% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.27× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.78× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DHC
| Senior Housing Operating Portfolio Segment | $323.4M | 85% |
| Rental Income | $56.2M | 15% |
USNA
Segment breakdown not available.