vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Danaher Corporation (DHR) and US Foods Holding Corp. (USFD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
US Foods Holding Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.8B vs $6.0B, roughly 1.6× Danaher Corporation). Danaher Corporation runs the higher net margin — 17.3% vs 1.9%, a 15.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Danaher Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.7% vs 3.3%). Danaher Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.1B vs $159.0M). Over the past eight quarters, US Foods Holding Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (4.6% CAGR vs 1.8%).
Danaher CorporationDHREarnings & Financial Report
Danaher Corporation is an American healthcare company headquartered in Washington, D.C.. It develops products used for advances in biotechnology, life sciences, and diagnostics. The company operates three divisions: biotechnology, which develops products for the development of therapeutics; life sciences, which develops products to identify causes of disease, new therapies, and to test and manufacture new drugs, vaccines and gene editing technologies; and diagnostics, which develops instruments,...
US Foods Holding Corp. is an American food service distributor. It is the second-largest food service distributor in the U.S., after Sysco. The company supplies 250,000 locations including independent restaurants, chain restaurants, healthcare, hospitality, and educational institutions.
DHR vs USFD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.0B | $9.8B |
| Net Profit | $1.0B | $184.0M |
| Gross Margin | 60.3% | 17.6% |
| Operating Margin | 22.6% | 3.3% |
| Net Margin | 17.3% | 1.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.7% | 3.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.9% | 178.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.45 | $0.82 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $6.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.8B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1B | $10.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9B | $10.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7B | $9.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | $9.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8B | $9.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.7B | $9.7B |
| Q1 26 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $184.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $908.0M | $153.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $555.0M | $224.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $954.0M | $115.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $66.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $818.0M | $148.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $907.0M | $198.0M |
| Q1 26 | 60.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 58.0% | 17.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.2% | 17.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.3% | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.2% | 17.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.5% | 17.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 58.7% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.7% | 17.6% |
| Q1 26 | 22.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.0% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.1% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.8% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.2% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.8% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.5% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | 3.6% |
| Q1 26 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.0% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.6% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.8% | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | $1.45 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.69 | $0.82 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.27 | $0.67 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.77 | $0.96 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.32 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.50 | $0.28 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.12 | $0.61 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.22 | $0.80 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $41.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $4.3B |
| Total Assets | — | $13.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.18× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $41.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $56.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $61.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $101.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $59.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $81.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $405.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.4B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.9B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.4B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5B | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.0B | $4.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $52.5B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.1B | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.3B | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.8B | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.5B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.3B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.9B | $5.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $83.5B | $13.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.9B | $14.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.6B | $13.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.1B | $13.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.5B | $13.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $80.6B | $13.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.6B | $13.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.35× | 1.18× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.33× | 1.08× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.33× | 1.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.32× | 1.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.32× | 1.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.34× | 1.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | 0.92× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.3B | $293.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.1B | $159.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 18.2% | 1.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.0% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.28× | 1.59× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $5.3B | $959.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $293.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $351.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $334.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $391.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $283.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $270.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $482.0M |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $159.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $236.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $257.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $307.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $178.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $190.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $413.0M |
| Q1 26 | 18.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.5% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.6% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.4% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.4% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.0% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.7% | 4.3% |
| Q1 26 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.2% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.1% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.0% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.77× | 1.59× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.83× | 2.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | 1.49× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.36× | 3.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.86× | 4.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.85× | 1.82× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.56× | 2.43× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DHR
Segment breakdown not available.
USFD
| Product One | $3.5B | 36% |
| Product Two | $1.7B | 17% |
| Product Three | $1.7B | 17% |
| Product Four | $985.0M | 10% |
| Product Five | $901.0M | 9% |
| Product Six | $580.0M | 6% |
| Product Seven | $485.0M | 5% |
