vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Danaher Corporation (DHR) and WESCO INTERNATIONAL INC (WCC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WESCO INTERNATIONAL INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.1B vs $6.0B, roughly 1.0× Danaher Corporation). Danaher Corporation runs the higher net margin — 17.3% vs 2.5%, a 14.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WESCO INTERNATIONAL INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.8% vs 3.7%). Over the past eight quarters, WESCO INTERNATIONAL INC's revenue compounded faster (5.3% CAGR vs 1.8%).
Danaher CorporationDHREarnings & Financial Report
Danaher Corporation is an American healthcare company headquartered in Washington, D.C.. It develops products used for advances in biotechnology, life sciences, and diagnostics. The company operates three divisions: biotechnology, which develops products for the development of therapeutics; life sciences, which develops products to identify causes of disease, new therapies, and to test and manufacture new drugs, vaccines and gene editing technologies; and diagnostics, which develops instruments,...
Wesco International, Inc. is a publicly traded American holding company for Wesco Distribution, an electrical distribution and services company based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
DHR vs WCC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.0B | $6.1B |
| Net Profit | $1.0B | $153.8M |
| Gross Margin | 60.3% | 21.2% |
| Operating Margin | 22.6% | 4.8% |
| Net Margin | 17.3% | 2.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.7% | 13.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.9% | 47.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.45 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $6.0B | $6.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.8B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1B | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9B | $5.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7B | $5.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8B | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.7B | $5.5B |
| Q1 26 | $1.0B | $153.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $159.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $908.0M | $187.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $555.0M | $174.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $954.0M | $118.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $165.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $818.0M | $204.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $907.0M | $232.1M |
| Q1 26 | 60.3% | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 58.0% | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.2% | 21.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.3% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.2% | 21.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.5% | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 58.7% | 22.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.7% | 21.9% |
| Q1 26 | 22.6% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.0% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.1% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.8% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.2% | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.8% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.5% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | 5.9% |
| Q1 26 | 17.3% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.5% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.0% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.6% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.6% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.1% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.8% | 4.2% |
| Q1 26 | $1.45 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.69 | $3.33 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.27 | $3.79 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.77 | $3.83 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.32 | $2.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.50 | $3.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.12 | $3.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.22 | $4.28 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $696.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $5.1B |
| Total Assets | — | $17.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $696.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $52.5B | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.1B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.3B | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.8B | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.5B | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.3B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.9B | $4.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $17.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $83.5B | $16.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.9B | $16.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.6B | $16.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.1B | $15.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.5B | $15.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $80.6B | $15.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.6B | $15.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.3B | $221.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $213.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 3.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.0% | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.28× | 1.44× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $231.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | $221.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $71.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $-82.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $107.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $28.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $276.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $302.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $-223.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $213.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $27.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $-95.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $86.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $7.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $252.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $272.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $-244.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.5% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.6% | -1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.0% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.7% | -4.5% |
| Q1 26 | 4.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.8% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.2% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.0% | 0.4% |
| Q1 26 | 1.28× | 1.44× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.77× | 0.45× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.83× | -0.44× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.36× | 0.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.86× | 1.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.85× | 1.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.56× | -0.96× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DHR
Segment breakdown not available.
WCC
| CSS | $2.5B | 41% |
| EES | $2.2B | 37% |
| UBS | $1.4B | 22% |
