vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) and Forestar Group Inc. (FOR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Forestar Group Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($273.0M vs $217.6M, roughly 1.3× Dine Brands Global, Inc.). Forestar Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.6% vs -5.6%, a 11.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Forestar Group Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.0% vs 6.3%). Dine Brands Global, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-8.6M vs $-157.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (2.7% CAGR vs -9.6%).
Dine Brands Global Inc. is a publicly traded food and beverage company based in Pasadena, California. Founded in 1958 as IHOP, it operates franchised and corporate owned full-service restaurants including three restaurant concepts, Applebee's Neighborhood Grill & Bar, International House of Pancakes (IHOP), and Fuzzy's Taco Shop.
Forestar Group Inc. is a residential lot development company based in Arlington, Texas. The company has operations in 51 markets in 21 states and delivered 11,518 residential lots during the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2020. The company is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange and in October 2017 became a majority-owned subsidiary of D.R. Horton, Inc., the largest homebuilder by volume in the United States since 2002. The company primarily acquires entitled real estate and...
DIN vs FOR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $217.6M | $273.0M |
| Net Profit | $-12.2M | $15.4M |
| Gross Margin | 42.4% | 20.1% |
| Operating Margin | -7.6% | 7.6% |
| Net Margin | -5.6% | 5.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.3% | 9.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -336.1% | -6.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.79 | $0.30 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $217.6M | $273.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $216.2M | $670.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $230.8M | $390.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.8M | $351.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.8M | $250.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $195.0M | $551.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $206.3M | $318.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $206.2M | $333.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.2M | $15.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.3M | $86.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.8M | $32.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.2M | $31.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2M | $16.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.1M | $81.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.2M | $38.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.5M | $45.0M |
| Q4 25 | 42.4% | 20.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.1% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.0% | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.0% | 22.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.7% | 22.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.8% | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.1% | 22.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 47.2% | 24.9% |
| Q4 25 | -7.6% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | 16.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 11.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.6% | 19.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.1% | 16.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.7% | 17.6% |
| Q4 25 | -5.6% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.5% | 13.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.79 | $0.30 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.48 | $1.70 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.89 | $0.65 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.53 | $0.62 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.35 | $0.32 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.24 | $1.59 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.50 | $0.76 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.13 | $0.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $128.2M | $211.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.2B | $793.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-273.9M | $1.8B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $3.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.44× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $128.2M | $211.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $167.9M | $379.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.2M | $189.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $186.5M | $174.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $186.7M | $132.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $169.6M | $481.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $153.5M | $359.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $145.0M | $416.2M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $793.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $802.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $872.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $872.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $806.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $706.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $706.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $705.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-273.9M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-231.9M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-212.5M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-215.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-216.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-216.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-231.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $-244.8M | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.48× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.7M | $-157.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.6M | $-157.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.9% | -57.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.6% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -10.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $53.4M | $93.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.7M | $-157.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.2M | $256.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.0M | $15.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.1M | $-19.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.5M | $-450.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.5M | $119.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.6M | $-61.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.6M | $-59.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.6M | $-157.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.1M | $255.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.0M | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.8M | $-20.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.0M | $118.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.2M | $-62.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.2M | $-59.8M |
| Q4 25 | -3.9% | -57.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.4% | 38.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | -5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | 21.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.8% | -19.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.2% | -17.9% |
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | -10.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.12× | 2.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.68× | 0.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.97× | -0.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.88× | -27.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.34× | 1.46× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.93× | -1.59× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.75× | -1.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DIN
| Franchisor | $163.2M | 75% |
| Food And Beverage | $27.3M | 13% |
| Proprietary Product Sales And Other | $17.0M | 8% |
| Other | $8.1M | 4% |
| Franchise And Development Fees | $2.0M | 1% |
FOR
| D.R.Horton Inc. | $183.8M | 67% |
| Other | $89.2M | 33% |
