vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) and PARK NATIONAL CORP (PRK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dine Brands Global, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($217.6M vs $168.3M, roughly 1.3× PARK NATIONAL CORP). PARK NATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 25.3% vs -5.6%, a 31.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dine Brands Global, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.3% vs 2.2%). PARK NATIONAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($191.9M vs $-8.6M). Over the past eight quarters, PARK NATIONAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (4.9% CAGR vs 2.7%).
Dine Brands Global Inc. is a publicly traded food and beverage company based in Pasadena, California. Founded in 1958 as IHOP, it operates franchised and corporate owned full-service restaurants including three restaurant concepts, Applebee's Neighborhood Grill & Bar, International House of Pancakes (IHOP), and Fuzzy's Taco Shop.
National Retail Systems, Inc. (NRS) includes Keystone Freight Corp. & National Retail Transportation, Inc. (NRT). NRS is an asset based 3PL founded in 1952. It is headquartered in Lyndhurst, New Jersey, United States.
DIN vs PRK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $217.6M | $168.3M |
| Net Profit | $-12.2M | $42.6M |
| Gross Margin | 42.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -7.6% | — |
| Net Margin | -5.6% | 25.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.3% | 2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -336.1% | 10.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.79 | $2.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $217.6M | $168.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $216.2M | $169.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $230.8M | $168.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.8M | $157.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.8M | $164.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $195.0M | $170.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $206.3M | $157.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $206.2M | $152.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.2M | $42.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.3M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.8M | $48.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.2M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2M | $38.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.1M | $38.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.2M | $39.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.5M | $35.2M |
| Q4 25 | 42.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 47.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | 34.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 32.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.6% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.1% | 30.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.7% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | -5.6% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | 27.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 28.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | 23.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 22.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | 25.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.5% | 23.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.79 | $2.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.48 | $2.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.89 | $2.97 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.53 | $2.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.35 | $2.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.24 | $2.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.50 | $2.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.13 | $2.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $128.2M | $233.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-273.9M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $128.2M | $233.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $167.9M | $218.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.2M | $193.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $186.5M | $237.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $186.7M | $160.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $169.6M | $201.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $153.5M | $261.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $145.0M | $306.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $-273.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-231.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-212.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-215.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-216.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-216.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-231.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $-244.8M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $9.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $9.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.7M | $198.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.6M | $191.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.9% | 114.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.6% | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $53.4M | $328.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.7M | $198.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.2M | $52.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.0M | $49.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.1M | $37.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.5M | $178.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.5M | $43.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.6M | $50.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.6M | $35.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.6M | $191.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.1M | $51.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.0M | $48.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.8M | $36.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.7M | $169.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.0M | $41.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.2M | $49.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.2M | $31.9M |
| Q4 25 | -3.9% | 114.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.4% | 30.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | 28.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 23.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.0% | 103.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.8% | 31.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.2% | 20.8% |
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 2.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.12× | 1.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.68× | 1.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.97× | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.88× | 4.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.34× | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.93× | 1.29× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.75× | 0.99× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DIN
| Franchisor | $163.2M | 75% |
| Food And Beverage | $27.3M | 13% |
| Proprietary Product Sales And Other | $17.0M | 8% |
| Other | $8.1M | 4% |
| Franchise And Development Fees | $2.0M | 1% |
PRK
Segment breakdown not available.
