vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) and ROGERS CORP (ROG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($395.6M vs $200.5M, roughly 2.0× ROGERS CORP). Dolby Laboratories, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 24.0% vs 2.2%, a 21.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dolby Laboratories, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.1% vs 5.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Dolby Laboratories, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (13.9% CAGR vs -3.3%).
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. is an American technology corporation specializing in audio noise reduction, audio encoding/compression, spatial audio, and high-dynamic-range television (HDR) imaging. Dolby licenses its technologies to consumer electronics manufacturers.
Rogers Corporation is a specialty engineered materials company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona.
DLB vs ROG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $395.6M | $200.5M |
| Net Profit | $94.9M | $4.5M |
| Gross Margin | 88.7% | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | 28.5% | — |
| Net Margin | 24.0% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.1% | 5.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.4% | 421.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.99 | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 26 | $395.6M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $346.7M | $200.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $346.7M | $201.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $307.0M | $216.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $315.5M | $202.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $369.6M | $190.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $357.0M | $192.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $304.8M | $210.3M |
| Q2 26 | $94.9M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $53.3M | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $53.3M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.3M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.1M | $-73.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $91.8M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.8M | $-500.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.6M | $10.7M |
| Q2 26 | 88.7% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 87.5% | 32.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 87.5% | 31.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 87.1% | 33.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 86.1% | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 90.3% | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 88.6% | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 88.8% | 35.2% |
| Q2 26 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.9% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.1% | -33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.2% | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.4% | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 6.9% |
| Q2 26 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 15.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.1% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.6% | -36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.0% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.2% | 5.1% |
| Q2 26 | $0.99 | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $0.55 | $0.25 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.55 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.50 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.48 | $-4.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.94 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.70 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.59 | $0.58 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $594.7M | $195.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.6B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | $594.7M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $644.6M | $195.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $644.6M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $702.6M | $167.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $699.3M | $157.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $626.6M | $175.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $520.8M | $159.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $482.0M | $146.4M |
| Q2 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $1.3B |
| Q2 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $1.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $147.3M | $5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.55× | 1.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $70.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | $147.3M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $54.8M | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $54.8M | $46.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $472.2M | $28.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.7M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $174.9M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.8M | $33.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $327.3M | $42.4M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $50.2M | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $435.9M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.3M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $168.0M | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.0M | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $297.2M | $25.2M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 142.0% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.4% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 97.5% | 12.0% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.8% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 8.2% |
| Q2 26 | 1.55× | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 1.03× | 1.29× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.03× | 10.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.57× | 3.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.91× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.57× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.59× | 3.96× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DLB
| Licensing | $372.2M | 94% |
| Products and services | $23.4M | 6% |
ROG
Segment breakdown not available.
