vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) and T1 Energy Inc. (TE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($395.6M vs $210.5M, roughly 1.9× T1 Energy Inc.). Dolby Laboratories, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 24.0% vs -62.0%, a 86.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. is an American technology corporation specializing in audio noise reduction, audio encoding/compression, spatial audio, and high-dynamic-range television (HDR) imaging. Dolby licenses its technologies to consumer electronics manufacturers.
Sony Energy Devices Corporation , is a Japanese multinational company specializing in a variety of areas in the energy industry, and is a wholly owned subsidiary and part of the Devices Group of Sony. The company was established in February 1975 in Fukushima, Japan.
DLB vs TE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $395.6M | $210.5M |
| Net Profit | $94.9M | $-130.6M |
| Gross Margin | 88.7% | 10.0% |
| Operating Margin | 28.5% | -45.0% |
| Net Margin | 24.0% | -62.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.1% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.4% | -375.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.99 | $-0.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 26 | $395.6M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $346.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $346.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $307.0M | $210.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $315.5M | $132.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $369.6M | $53.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $357.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $304.8M | $0 |
| Q2 26 | $94.9M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $53.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $53.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.3M | $-130.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.1M | $-31.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $91.8M | $-16.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.6M | $-27.5M |
| Q2 26 | 88.7% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 87.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 87.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 87.1% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 86.1% | 24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 90.3% | 33.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 88.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 88.8% | — |
| Q2 26 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | -45.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.1% | -22.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.2% | -44.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | — |
| Q2 26 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.1% | -62.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.6% | -24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | -30.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.2% | — |
| Q2 26 | $0.99 | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $0.55 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.55 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.50 | $-0.87 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.48 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.94 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.70 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.59 | $-0.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $594.7M | $34.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $547.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.6B | $96.9M |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 5.65× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | $594.7M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $644.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $644.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $702.6M | $34.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $699.3M | $8.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $626.6M | $48.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $520.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $482.0M | $181.9M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $547.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $591.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $603.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q2 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $96.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $183.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $201.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $538.7M |
| Q2 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $615.0M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $147.3M | $63.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $55.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 26.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.55× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-42.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | $147.3M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $54.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $54.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $472.2M | $63.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.7M | $33.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $174.9M | $-44.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $327.3M | $-28.4M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $50.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $435.9M | $55.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.3M | $10.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $168.0M | $-74.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $297.2M | $-34.0M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 142.0% | 26.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.4% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.5% | -138.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 97.5% | — |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.8% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 54.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | — |
| Q2 26 | 1.55× | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.57× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.91× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.57× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.59× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DLB
| Licensing | $372.2M | 94% |
| Products and services | $23.4M | 6% |
TE
| Related Party | $120.1M | 57% |
| Nonrelated Party | $90.4M | 43% |
