vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) and WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC (WTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($625.1M vs $395.6M, roughly 1.6× Dolby Laboratories, Inc.). Dolby Laboratories, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 24.0% vs 13.4%, a 10.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.7% vs 7.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Dolby Laboratories, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (13.9% CAGR vs 4.6%).
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. is an American technology corporation specializing in audio noise reduction, audio encoding/compression, spatial audio, and high-dynamic-range television (HDR) imaging. Dolby licenses its technologies to consumer electronics manufacturers.
AERCO International, Inc. is a manufacturer and supplier of commercial condensing boilers, high efficiency water heating equipment and energy recovery systems in the HVAC/plumbing industry across a variety of markets including education, lodging, government, office buildings, healthcare, industrial and multifamily housing. In 1949, AERCO introduced the industry's first semi-instantaneous, tankless steam-to-water water heater. In 1988, AERCO introduced the first condensing and fully modulating...
DLB vs WTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $395.6M | $625.1M |
| Net Profit | $94.9M | $83.7M |
| Gross Margin | 88.7% | 49.5% |
| Operating Margin | 28.5% | 18.2% |
| Net Margin | 24.0% | 13.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.1% | 15.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.4% | 24.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.99 | $2.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 26 | $395.6M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $346.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $346.7M | $625.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $307.0M | $611.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $315.5M | $643.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $369.6M | $558.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $357.0M | $540.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $304.8M | $543.6M |
| Q2 26 | $94.9M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $53.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $53.3M | $83.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.3M | $82.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.1M | $100.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $91.8M | $74.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.8M | $67.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.6M | $69.1M |
| Q2 26 | 88.7% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 87.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 87.5% | 49.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 87.1% | 48.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 86.1% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 90.3% | 48.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 88.6% | 46.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 88.8% | 47.3% |
| Q2 26 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.9% | 18.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.1% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.2% | 15.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.4% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 17.1% |
| Q2 26 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.1% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.6% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.0% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.2% | 12.7% |
| Q2 26 | $0.99 | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $0.55 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.55 | $2.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.50 | $2.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.48 | $3.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.94 | $2.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.70 | $2.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.59 | $2.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $594.7M | $405.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.6B | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $2.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | $594.7M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $644.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $644.6M | $405.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $702.6M | $457.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $699.3M | $369.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $626.6M | $336.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $520.8M | $386.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $482.0M | $303.9M |
| Q2 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $1.7B |
| Q2 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $2.4B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $147.3M | $154.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $140.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 22.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.55× | 1.85× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $356.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | $147.3M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $54.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $54.8M | $154.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $472.2M | $122.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.7M | $69.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $174.9M | $55.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.8M | $139.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $327.3M | $90.7M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $50.2M | $140.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $435.9M | $110.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.3M | $59.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $168.0M | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.0M | $127.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $297.2M | $84.3M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 142.0% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.4% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.5% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 97.5% | 15.5% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 1.2% |
| Q2 26 | 1.55× | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.03× | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.57× | 1.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.47× | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.91× | 0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.57× | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.59× | 1.31× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DLB
| Licensing | $372.2M | 94% |
| Products and services | $23.4M | 6% |
WTS
Segment breakdown not available.
