vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Digital Realty (DLR) and North American Construction Group Ltd. (NOA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Digital Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.6B vs $860.2M, roughly 1.9× North American Construction Group Ltd.). Digital Realty runs the higher net margin — 6.0% vs 4.7%, a 1.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, North American Construction Group Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (58.0% CAGR vs 9.8%).

Digital Realty is a real estate investment trust that owns, operates and invests in carrier-neutral data centers across the world. The company offers data center, colocation, and interconnection services.

Shanghai Construction (Group) Corporation (SCG) is a Chinese construction and engineering company, ranked as the 16th largest construction company in the world based on 2011 revenues.

DLR vs NOA — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
DLR
DLR
1.9× larger
DLR
$1.6B
$860.2M
NOA
Higher net margin
DLR
DLR
1.3% more per $
DLR
6.0%
4.7%
NOA
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
NOA
NOA
Annualised
NOA
58.0%
9.8%
DLR

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025

Metric
DLR
DLR
NOA
NOA
Revenue
$1.6B
$860.2M
Net Profit
$98.6M
$40.5M
Gross Margin
19.7%
Operating Margin
6.9%
15.4%
Net Margin
6.0%
4.7%
Revenue YoY
16.1%
Net Profit YoY
-10.3%
EPS (diluted)
$0.22

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
DLR
DLR
NOA
NOA
Q1 26
$1.6B
Q4 25
$1.6B
Q3 25
$1.6B
$860.2M
Q2 25
$1.5B
$573.3M
Q1 25
$1.4B
$297.0M
Q4 24
$1.4B
Q3 24
$1.4B
$636.4M
Q2 24
$1.4B
$439.5M
Net Profit
DLR
DLR
NOA
NOA
Q1 26
$98.6M
Q4 25
$98.6M
Q3 25
$67.8M
$40.5M
Q2 25
$1.0B
$26.0M
Q1 25
$110.0M
$11.5M
Q4 24
$189.6M
Q3 24
$51.2M
$45.5M
Q2 24
$80.2M
$34.1M
Gross Margin
DLR
DLR
NOA
NOA
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
19.7%
Q2 25
18.1%
Q1 25
18.0%
Q4 24
Q3 24
14.0%
Q2 24
14.3%
Operating Margin
DLR
DLR
NOA
NOA
Q1 26
6.9%
Q4 25
6.9%
Q3 25
8.8%
15.4%
Q2 25
14.2%
13.6%
Q1 25
13.9%
13.0%
Q4 24
10.1%
Q3 24
11.8%
7.9%
Q2 24
0.7%
8.2%
Net Margin
DLR
DLR
NOA
NOA
Q1 26
6.0%
Q4 25
6.0%
Q3 25
4.3%
4.7%
Q2 25
69.1%
4.5%
Q1 25
7.8%
3.9%
Q4 24
13.2%
Q3 24
3.6%
7.1%
Q2 24
5.9%
7.8%
EPS (diluted)
DLR
DLR
NOA
NOA
Q1 26
$0.22
Q4 25
$0.22
Q3 25
$0.15
Q2 25
$2.94
Q1 25
$0.27
Q4 24
$0.50
Q3 24
$0.09
Q2 24
$0.20

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
DLR
DLR
NOA
NOA
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$3.5B
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$22.9B
Total Assets
$49.4B
$1.7B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
DLR
DLR
NOA
NOA
Q1 26
$3.5B
Q4 25
$3.5B
Q3 25
$3.3B
Q2 25
$3.6B
Q1 25
$2.3B
Q4 24
$3.9B
Q3 24
$2.2B
Q2 24
$2.3B
Stockholders' Equity
DLR
DLR
NOA
NOA
Q1 26
$22.9B
Q4 25
$22.9B
Q3 25
$23.0B
Q2 25
$22.9B
Q1 25
$21.3B
Q4 24
$21.3B
Q3 24
$21.2B
Q2 24
$20.5B
Total Assets
DLR
DLR
NOA
NOA
Q1 26
$49.4B
Q4 25
$49.4B
Q3 25
$48.7B
$1.7B
Q2 25
$48.7B
$1.7B
Q1 25
$45.1B
$1.7B
Q4 24
$45.3B
Q3 24
$45.3B
$1.5B
Q2 24
$43.6B
$1.5B

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
DLR
DLR
NOA
NOA
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$140.7M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
3.47×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
DLR
DLR
NOA
NOA
Q1 26
Q4 25
$719.0M
Q3 25
$652.9M
$140.7M
Q2 25
$641.2M
$85.4M
Q1 25
$399.1M
$19.0M
Q4 24
$769.5M
Q3 24
$566.5M
$109.5M
Q2 24
$573.2M
$72.0M
Cash Conversion
DLR
DLR
NOA
NOA
Q1 26
Q4 25
7.29×
Q3 25
9.63×
3.47×
Q2 25
0.62×
3.28×
Q1 25
3.63×
1.65×
Q4 24
4.06×
Q3 24
11.07×
2.41×
Q2 24
7.15×
2.11×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons