vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Krispy Kreme, Inc. (DNUT) and Forestar Group Inc. (FOR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Krispy Kreme, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($392.4M vs $273.0M, roughly 1.4× Forestar Group Inc.). Forestar Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.6% vs -7.1%, a 12.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Forestar Group Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.0% vs -2.9%). Krispy Kreme, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($27.9M vs $-157.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Krispy Kreme, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-5.9% CAGR vs -9.6%).
Krispy Kreme, Inc. is an American multinational doughnut company and coffeehouse chain. Krispy Kreme was founded by Vernon Rudolph (1915–1973), who bought a yeast-raised recipe from a New Orleans chef, rented a building in 1937 in what is now historic Old Salem in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, and began selling to local grocery stores. Steady growth preceded an ambitious expansion as a public company in the period 2000 to 2016, which ultimately proved unprofitable. In 2016, the company retur...
Forestar Group Inc. is a residential lot development company based in Arlington, Texas. The company has operations in 51 markets in 21 states and delivered 11,518 residential lots during the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2020. The company is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange and in October 2017 became a majority-owned subsidiary of D.R. Horton, Inc., the largest homebuilder by volume in the United States since 2002. The company primarily acquires entitled real estate and...
DNUT vs FOR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $392.4M | $273.0M |
| Net Profit | $-27.8M | $15.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 20.1% |
| Operating Margin | -1.9% | 7.6% |
| Net Margin | -7.1% | 5.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.9% | 9.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -23.8% | -6.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.18 | $0.30 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $392.4M | $273.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $375.3M | $670.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $379.8M | $390.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $375.2M | $351.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $404.0M | $250.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $379.9M | $551.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $438.8M | $318.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $442.7M | $333.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-27.8M | $15.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-19.4M | $86.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-435.3M | $32.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.3M | $31.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-22.4M | $16.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.6M | $81.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.5M | $38.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.5M | $45.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 20.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 22.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 22.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 24.9% |
| Q4 25 | -1.9% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.9% | 16.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.4% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.4% | 11.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.2% | 19.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 16.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.7% | 17.6% |
| Q4 25 | -7.1% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.2% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.6% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.9% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.6% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.3% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.9% | 13.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.18 | $0.30 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $1.70 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.55 | $0.65 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $0.62 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $0.32 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.23 | $1.59 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $0.76 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.05 | $0.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $42.4M | $211.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $911.9M | $793.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $650.1M | $1.8B |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $3.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.40× | 0.44× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $42.4M | $211.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.7M | $379.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.3M | $189.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.7M | $174.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $132.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.4M | $481.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.6M | $359.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.1M | $416.2M |
| Q4 25 | $911.9M | $793.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $906.2M | $802.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $889.4M | $872.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $935.0M | $872.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $844.5M | $806.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $804.6M | $706.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $895.0M | $706.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $881.8M | $705.7M |
| Q4 25 | $650.1M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $670.3M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $693.6M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2B | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | 1.40× | 0.44× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.35× | 0.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | 0.52× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.85× | 0.53× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | 0.50× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.79× | 0.47× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.76× | 0.48× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $45.0M | $-157.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.9M | $-157.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.1% | -57.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.4% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -10.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-64.0M | $93.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $45.0M | $-157.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.3M | $256.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-32.5M | $15.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.8M | $-19.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.0M | $-450.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $119.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.2M | $-61.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.7M | $-59.2M |
| Q4 25 | $27.9M | $-157.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.5M | $255.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-60.8M | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-46.7M | $-20.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-22.9M | $118.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $-62.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-46.8M | $-59.8M |
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | -57.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 38.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.0% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -12.5% | -5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.0% | 21.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | -19.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.6% | -17.9% |
| Q4 25 | 4.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.6% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | -10.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -27.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.08× | 1.46× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1.59× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DNUT
Segment breakdown not available.
FOR
| D.R.Horton Inc. | $183.8M | 67% |
| Other | $89.2M | 33% |
