vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Krispy Kreme, Inc. (DNUT) and GRIFFON CORP (GFF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GRIFFON CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($649.1M vs $392.4M, roughly 1.7× Krispy Kreme, Inc.). GRIFFON CORP runs the higher net margin — 9.9% vs -7.1%, a 17.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GRIFFON CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.6% vs -2.9%). GRIFFON CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($99.3M vs $27.9M). Over the past eight quarters, GRIFFON CORP's revenue compounded faster (-1.8% CAGR vs -5.9%).
Krispy Kreme, Inc. is an American multinational doughnut company and coffeehouse chain. Krispy Kreme was founded by Vernon Rudolph (1915–1973), who bought a yeast-raised recipe from a New Orleans chef, rented a building in 1937 in what is now historic Old Salem in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, and began selling to local grocery stores. Steady growth preceded an ambitious expansion as a public company in the period 2000 to 2016, which ultimately proved unprofitable. In 2016, the company retur...
Griffon Corporation is a multinational conglomerate headquartered in New York City. It operates as a diversified management and holding company. The company has four subsidiaries: Ames True Temper, ClosetMaid, Clopay Building Products, and CornellCookson. Griffon has been publicly traded since 1961 and is listed on the New York Stock Exchange as a component stock of the S&P SmallCap 600, S&P Composite 1500, and Russell 2000 indices.
DNUT vs GFF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $392.4M | $649.1M |
| Net Profit | $-27.8M | $64.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.1% |
| Operating Margin | -1.9% | 17.5% |
| Net Margin | -7.1% | 9.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.9% | 2.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -23.8% | -9.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.18 | $1.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $392.4M | $649.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $375.3M | $662.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $379.8M | $613.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $375.2M | $611.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $404.0M | $632.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $379.9M | $659.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $438.8M | $647.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $442.7M | $672.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-27.8M | $64.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-19.4M | $43.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-435.3M | $-120.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.3M | $56.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-22.4M | $70.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.6M | $62.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.5M | $41.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.5M | $64.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 41.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 39.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 38.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 40.2% |
| Q4 25 | -1.9% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.9% | 18.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.4% | -20.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.4% | 16.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.2% | 16.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.7% | 16.9% |
| Q4 25 | -7.1% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.2% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.6% | -19.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.9% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.6% | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.3% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.9% | 9.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.18 | $1.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $1.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.55 | $-2.65 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $1.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $1.49 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.23 | $1.29 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $0.84 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.05 | $1.28 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $42.4M | $95.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $911.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $650.1M | $108.9M |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $2.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.40× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $42.4M | $95.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.7M | $99.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.3M | $107.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.7M | $127.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $152.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.4M | $114.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.6M | $133.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.1M | $123.0M |
| Q4 25 | $911.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $906.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $889.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $935.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $844.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $804.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $895.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $881.8M | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $650.1M | $108.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $670.3M | $74.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $693.6M | $63.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $214.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $227.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $224.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $223.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $202.2M |
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2B | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.35× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | 22.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.85× | 7.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | 6.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 6.78× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.79× | 6.74× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.76× | 7.84× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $45.0M | $107.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.9M | $99.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.1% | 15.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.4% | 1.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-64.0M | $278.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $45.0M | $107.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.3M | $75.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-32.5M | $123.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.8M | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.0M | $142.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $72.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.2M | $122.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.7M | $39.8M |
| Q4 25 | $27.9M | $99.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.5M | $62.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-60.8M | $114.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-46.7M | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.9M | $125.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-22.9M | $51.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $107.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-46.8M | $20.8M |
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.0% | 18.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -12.5% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.7% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 16.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.6% | 3.1% |
| Q4 25 | 4.4% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.6% | 2.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.08× | 1.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.97× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.62× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DNUT
Segment breakdown not available.
GFF
| Consumer And Professional Products | $241.1M | 37% |
| Residential Repairand Remodel | $202.1M | 31% |
| International Excluding North America | $97.8M | 15% |
| Retail | $47.3M | 7% |
| Residential New Construction | $32.5M | 5% |
| Other | $14.2M | 2% |
| Industrial | $14.1M | 2% |
