vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Krispy Kreme, Inc. (DNUT) and Kimco Realty (KIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($558.0M vs $392.4M, roughly 1.4× Krispy Kreme, Inc.). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs -7.1%, a 36.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kimco Realty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.0% vs -2.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Kimco Realty's revenue compounded faster (5.6% CAGR vs -5.9%).

Krispy Kreme, Inc. is an American multinational doughnut company and coffeehouse chain. Krispy Kreme was founded by Vernon Rudolph (1915–1973), who bought a yeast-raised recipe from a New Orleans chef, rented a building in 1937 in what is now historic Old Salem in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, and began selling to local grocery stores. Steady growth preceded an ambitious expansion as a public company in the period 2000 to 2016, which ultimately proved unprofitable. In 2016, the company retur...

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

DNUT vs KIM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KIM
KIM
1.4× larger
KIM
$558.0M
$392.4M
DNUT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
KIM
KIM
+6.9% gap
KIM
4.0%
-2.9%
DNUT
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
36.9% more per $
KIM
29.8%
-7.1%
DNUT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
KIM
KIM
Annualised
KIM
5.6%
-5.9%
DNUT

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
DNUT
DNUT
KIM
KIM
Revenue
$392.4M
$558.0M
Net Profit
$-27.8M
$166.3M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
-1.9%
37.2%
Net Margin
-7.1%
29.8%
Revenue YoY
-2.9%
4.0%
Net Profit YoY
-23.8%
23.7%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.18
$0.46

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
DNUT
DNUT
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$558.0M
Q4 25
$392.4M
$542.5M
Q3 25
$375.3M
$535.9M
Q2 25
$379.8M
$525.2M
Q1 25
$375.2M
$536.6M
Q4 24
$404.0M
$525.4M
Q3 24
$379.9M
$507.6M
Q2 24
$438.8M
$500.2M
Net Profit
DNUT
DNUT
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$166.3M
Q4 25
$-27.8M
$151.2M
Q3 25
$-19.4M
$137.8M
Q2 25
$-435.3M
$163.0M
Q1 25
$-33.3M
$132.8M
Q4 24
$-22.4M
$166.0M
Q3 24
$39.6M
$136.0M
Q2 24
$-5.5M
$119.7M
Operating Margin
DNUT
DNUT
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
37.2%
Q4 25
-1.9%
36.4%
Q3 25
-1.9%
34.9%
Q2 25
-114.4%
39.2%
Q1 25
-5.4%
33.6%
Q4 24
-2.8%
31.7%
Q3 24
-4.2%
33.7%
Q2 24
1.6%
32.1%
Net Margin
DNUT
DNUT
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
29.8%
Q4 25
-7.1%
27.9%
Q3 25
-5.2%
25.7%
Q2 25
-114.6%
31.0%
Q1 25
-8.9%
24.8%
Q4 24
-5.6%
31.6%
Q3 24
10.4%
26.8%
Q2 24
-1.3%
23.9%
EPS (diluted)
DNUT
DNUT
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$0.46
Q4 25
$-0.18
Q3 25
$-0.11
Q2 25
$-2.55
Q1 25
$-0.20
Q4 24
$-0.13
Q3 24
$0.23
Q2 24
$-0.03

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
DNUT
DNUT
KIM
KIM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$42.4M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$911.9M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$650.1M
$10.4B
Total Assets
$2.6B
$19.6B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.40×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
DNUT
DNUT
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$42.4M
$211.6M
Q3 25
$30.7M
$159.3M
Q2 25
$21.3M
$226.6M
Q1 25
$18.7M
$131.3M
Q4 24
$29.0M
$688.6M
Q3 24
$25.4M
$789.0M
Q2 24
$28.6M
$126.4M
Total Debt
DNUT
DNUT
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$911.9M
$7.7B
Q3 25
$906.2M
Q2 25
$889.4M
Q1 25
$935.0M
Q4 24
$844.5M
$8.0B
Q3 24
$804.6M
Q2 24
$895.0M
Stockholders' Equity
DNUT
DNUT
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$10.4B
Q4 25
$650.1M
$10.4B
Q3 25
$670.3M
$10.5B
Q2 25
$693.6M
$10.5B
Q1 25
$1.1B
$10.6B
Q4 24
$1.1B
$10.7B
Q3 24
$1.2B
$10.5B
Q2 24
$1.1B
$10.6B
Total Assets
DNUT
DNUT
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$19.6B
Q4 25
$2.6B
$19.7B
Q3 25
$2.6B
$19.9B
Q2 25
$2.6B
$19.8B
Q1 25
$3.1B
$19.7B
Q4 24
$3.1B
$20.3B
Q3 24
$3.1B
$20.1B
Q2 24
$3.2B
$19.5B
Debt / Equity
DNUT
DNUT
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.40×
0.74×
Q3 25
1.35×
Q2 25
1.28×
Q1 25
0.85×
Q4 24
0.74×
0.75×
Q3 24
0.68×
Q2 24
0.79×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
DNUT
DNUT
KIM
KIM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$45.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$27.9M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
7.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
4.4%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-64.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
DNUT
DNUT
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$45.0M
$258.4M
Q3 25
$42.3M
$332.4M
Q2 25
$-32.5M
$305.4M
Q1 25
$-20.8M
$223.8M
Q4 24
$27.0M
$239.5M
Q3 24
$3.3M
$295.9M
Q2 24
$33.2M
$294.1M
Free Cash Flow
DNUT
DNUT
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$27.9M
Q3 25
$15.5M
Q2 25
$-60.8M
Q1 25
$-46.7M
$205.4M
Q4 24
$-6.9M
Q3 24
$-22.9M
Q2 24
$1.6M
FCF Margin
DNUT
DNUT
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
7.1%
Q3 25
4.1%
Q2 25
-16.0%
Q1 25
-12.5%
38.3%
Q4 24
-1.7%
Q3 24
-6.0%
Q2 24
0.4%
Capex Intensity
DNUT
DNUT
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
4.4%
0.0%
Q3 25
7.1%
0.0%
Q2 25
7.4%
0.0%
Q1 25
6.9%
3.4%
Q4 24
8.4%
Q3 24
6.9%
Q2 24
7.2%
Cash Conversion
DNUT
DNUT
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.71×
Q3 25
2.41×
Q2 25
1.87×
Q1 25
1.69×
Q4 24
1.44×
Q3 24
0.08×
2.18×
Q2 24
2.46×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

DNUT
DNUT

Segment breakdown not available.

KIM
KIM

Revenues from rental properties, net$552.8M99%
Management and other fee income$5.2M1%

Related Comparisons