vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Krispy Kreme, Inc. (DNUT) and OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC (OII). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($692.4M vs $392.4M, roughly 1.8× Krispy Kreme, Inc.). OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC runs the higher net margin — 5.2% vs -7.1%, a 12.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.6% vs -2.9%). Krispy Kreme, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($27.9M vs $-76.5M). Over the past eight quarters, OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC's revenue compounded faster (1.8% CAGR vs -5.9%).
Krispy Kreme, Inc. is an American multinational doughnut company and coffeehouse chain. Krispy Kreme was founded by Vernon Rudolph (1915–1973), who bought a yeast-raised recipe from a New Orleans chef, rented a building in 1937 in what is now historic Old Salem in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, and began selling to local grocery stores. Steady growth preceded an ambitious expansion as a public company in the period 2000 to 2016, which ultimately proved unprofitable. In 2016, the company retur...
Oceaneering International, Inc. is a subsea engineering and applied technology company based in Houston, Texas, U.S. that provides engineered services and hardware to customers who operate in marine, space, and other environments.
DNUT vs OII — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $392.4M | $692.4M |
| Net Profit | $-27.8M | $36.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -1.9% | — |
| Net Margin | -7.1% | 5.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.9% | 3.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -23.8% | -28.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.18 | $0.36 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $692.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $392.4M | $668.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $375.3M | $742.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $379.8M | $698.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $375.2M | $674.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $404.0M | $713.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $379.9M | $679.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $438.8M | $668.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $36.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-27.8M | $177.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-19.4M | $71.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-435.3M | $54.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.3M | $50.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-22.4M | $56.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.6M | $41.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.5M | $35.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 18.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.9% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.9% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.4% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.4% | 10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.2% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 9.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -7.1% | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.2% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.6% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.9% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.6% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.3% | 5.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.36 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.18 | $1.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.71 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.55 | $0.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.23 | $0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $0.34 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $42.4M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $911.9M | $488.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $650.1M | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $2.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.40× | 0.44× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $42.4M | $695.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.7M | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.3M | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.7M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $504.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $488.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $911.9M | $487.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $906.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $889.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $935.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $844.5M | $482.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $804.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $895.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $650.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $670.3M | $907.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $693.6M | $842.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $773.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $714.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $698.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $651.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.40× | 0.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.35× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.85× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | 0.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.79× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $45.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.9M | $-76.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.1% | -11.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.4% | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-64.0M | $238.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $45.0M | $221.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.3M | $101.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-32.5M | $77.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.8M | $-80.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.0M | $128.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $91.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.2M | $52.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-76.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $27.9M | $190.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.5M | $77.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-60.8M | $46.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-46.7M | $-106.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.9M | $94.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-22.9M | $67.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $29.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | -11.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | 28.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.0% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -12.5% | -15.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.7% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.0% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 4.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.4% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | 3.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.08× | 2.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.50× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.